jacktang Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 In 1939 Heirich Stockler of Leitz came out with a developer which gave highest possible sharpness without loss of speed Solution A metol 5 gram sodium sulphite 100 gram in 1000 cc water Solution B borax 10 gram in 1000 cc water develop film in solution A for 2-5 minutes 68 degree F follow by development in solution B for 3 minutes Do not rinse film between baths Source Aaron Sussman The Amateur Photographer's Handbook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterbcarter Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Stoeckler test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 I wonder how the results of this formulation compare with Rodinal, which was in use at that time, and still fairly widely available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 There's another report on this at The Stoeckler two-bath film developer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Bowes Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 This formula is very close to Divided D-23. I used the divided formula for several years with 35 & 120 films & was very happy with the results, especially using a diffused Omega enlarger with the negs. Current results with my Pyro staining developers (currently Pyrocat HDC) are similar, and much less "trouble". Aloha, Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_hoffman Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Old developer formulas were made for old films. Some work great to this day. Others, not so much. I think Anchell & Troop had something to say about this. I'd be suspicious of divided developers without reasonable testing. Also, there really isn't any magic formula that gives the best of all worlds. If you develop films to the same gamma, differences in developers tend to be less then people think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 It's a 'surface' developer, which was an innovation at the time when miniature film use was still a novelty. The hype of 1939 can hardly be considered a recommendation against the more sophisticated acutance formulations that came after. WRT comparison with Rodinal - there is none. Rodinal has no pretentions to fine grain or control of tonality. It's basically caustic soda and a developing agent; about as crude a developer as you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now