Jump to content

spiratone 20mm f2.8 infinity focus issue


norayr

Recommended Posts

hello, i am not sure if this should go to 'classic manual cameras' or here in to the nikon subforum.

 

so, i have a nikon n2000, two of them. I have 50mm f1.8, and chinar 28mm f2.8. both work fine.

 

i recently obtained spiratone 20mm f2.8, so the issue is, when it's on camera, any of them, and i put the focus to infinity sign, then in the viewfinder, the lines are still broke by the line in the circle.

 

spiratone-20mm-8-nikon-ai-pluracoat_1_8661440932317c8500b3338a4b0c78ff.jpg

 

you know, you see a circle and an intersecting line, and this line divides the lines you see, and if the line in your scene is broken by the line in the lens, then the focus is not on that object the line belongs to. you need to rotate the focus ring so that the line of the object you are aiming to keep in focus become uninterruptible.

 

so, with this spiratone, at least on my cameras, this line is always broken.

 

my impression is, this spiratone lens have been made specifically for nikon.

 

what do you think? is it normal? does it mean the lens are not calibrated?

i did not have the results yet, but when i keep the focus on infinity, and shoot buildings, does that mean the building will be out of focus, because its lines are interrupted in the viefinder?

or may be on another nikon camera the lens will work okay?

thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an OLD lens. It may have been knocked out of alignment, the focus scale could have rotated, or it was improperly "fixed" in the decades since it was first sold.

Do NOT focus on infinity on the lens, focus with the viewfinder. Although with DoF at f/8 it probably won't make any difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do NOT focus on infinity on the lens, focus with the viewfinder

Yup, +1 on that.

 

If you can't get the lines to align on a far off building, power line, tree etc return it. It's either been opened up and reassembled badly or has taken a big knock somewhere.

 

my impression is, this spiratone lens have been made specifically for nikon

Yup again, those little shiny chrome 'bunny ears' are unique to Nikon, so yes it is meant to be used on a Nikon only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spiratone didn't make anything, they just re-badged it. From the style, that's almost certainly a re-badged Tokina made lens. Hope you didn't pay a lot for it.

 

What others have said, plus buildings are never at infinity. So I presume the lens focusses short of infinity. A knock hardly ever does that without leaving major physical damage. So my guess is it's been inexpertly 'repaired' in the past.

 

Having said that - it's worth checking that the rear lens assembly hasn't worked loose and partially unscrewed itself. A quick grip and twist with your fingers (if possible) on the rear elements of the lens should tell you if this is the case. Don't touch the glass itself though, just the black barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, the "broken line" in the center of the viewfinder is called a "split image rangefinder".

 

As noted above, don't focus the lens on infinity and expect even distant objects to be in focus. Use the viewfinder and the tools that it provides.

 

Many lenses will turn and focus past infinity. This is done for a number of engineering reasons including thermal expansion and loose manufacturing tolerances.

 

From what you say, the split image works correctly on the other lenses? It may be that the problem is with the camera body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I like the moon as an infinity target.

 

It's certainly further away than any terrestrial objects you can see from sea level, and for all intents and purposes for our applications on our cameras it's at infinity. It has a defined edge line for a split image, and is bright enough to both make a microprism "disappear" and to see easily to line up a co-incident rangefinder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
he refused to explain. sort of arrogant, said - does it matter to you, you won't understand anyway.

 

My guess is that he was avoiding getting into a half hour explanation of what he did. That half hour is not billable, so he is loosing money, vs. working on another repair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...