Jump to content

What camera(s) are you using this weekend?


Recommended Posts

Giving a couple of my favourites an exercise, the Minolta SR-T 202 fitted with the excellent Minolta MD 35-70mm f/3.5 lens. I've posted a few samples over on the current weekly thread.

 

Minolta SR-T 202

 

[ATTACH=full]1253797[/ATTACH]

 

Gorgeous shot, Rick. I'm guessing it's on a sheet of glass, over the table, and that's why it looks like it's floating? I find the reflection on the lower edge distracting but, overall, it's great gear porn. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I've said in past threads, that 35-70 is a good fit for the SRT series of cameras. Mine is currently "assigned" to my SRT 101, waiting for film later today.

The last new 35-70 I saw was at the family camera shop in the late 80's. We sold it with an X700, motor drive, and PX 280 flash. As I recall, it made an easy to handle outfit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I've said in past threads, that 35-70 is a good fit for the SRT series of cameras. Mine is currently "assigned" to my SRT 101, waiting for film later today.

The last new 35-70 I saw was at the family camera shop in the late 80's. We sold it with an X700, motor drive, and PX 280 flash. As I recall, it made an easy to handle outfit.

Do you have the Minolta lens hood for this lens, Mike? I found it to be rather small and ineffective, and I now use the slightly deeper lens hood as illustrated. Mind you, I can't remember where I stored the original lens hood, anyway; somewhere safe, never to be seen again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rick- I don't have the hood, but usually don't have too much of a problem with flare. If I need a hood I just use the one from my Minolta 35-135. My first 35-70 (that I had in the early 80's) had a metal hood that was threaded like a filter. It really didn't make that much difference as I recall.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who wants to take pictures when you have coffee 559443527_ErconaII-horz.jpg.8fa902c2dae94b1586b9d757fc364f9a.jpg & strudel !! Nice combo Rick. After a long hibernation, my Ercona II will see some daylight (UFX 100) along with it's cousin the Fed-2 / Jupiter (Kentmere 400). Guess it will just have to be fresh berries at todays Market to start. Aloha from the Mainland, Bill
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finished up the roll of Plus-X in my Minolta XE with the 400mm f 6.3 preset attached. Of course, even a preset gives aperture priority automation with the XE. My preferred way to use a preset whether with match needle or aperture priority is turn the aperture ring to minimum and the open/close ring to wide open. I just turn the C/O ring until the needle matches or I get the desired shutter speed in AE. Works well enough that I never felt the need to buy a 400 with automatic diaphragm. I'll post a picture of the lens later.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using 3 out of 4 cameras in the photo below. The Bolsey needs some more work before I put film in it, but HP5+ in the Rollei 35 and Olympus 35RC. The Olympus XA, in a departure from my usual film choices, is loaded with a roll of Rolleipan 25 (one of about five or so reloads I have left from a bulk roll I bought several years back). Not the same film as the current RPX 25. Haven't decided yet if I'll soup in HC110 dilution H or stand develop in Rodinal at 1:100.

upload_2018-7-22_16-35-59.jpeg.51fd85051eafb7c9801ac7c73c0ff77c.jpeg

Note this is an older photo so ISO dials are not set for the film loaded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using 3 out of 4 cameras in the photo below. The Bolsey needs some more work before I put film in it, but HP5+ in the Rollei 35 and Olympus 35RC. The Olympus XA, in a departure from my usual film choices, is loaded with a roll of Rolleipan 25 (one of about five or so reloads I have left from a bulk roll I bought several years back). Not the same film as the current RPX 25. Haven't decided yet if I'll soup in HC110 dilution H or stand develop in Rodinal at 1:100.

[ATTACH=full]1254800[/ATTACH]

Note this is an older photo so ISO dials are not set for the film loaded.

Not to sidetrack the thread too much, but I notice that three of the four are among the most lauded compact 35mm's, so I'm curious about the Bolsey. Is it the equal of the others, when it's working properly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In it's day the Bolsey was one of the most compact non-folding 35's available. It has a 44mm f 3.2 lens made by Wolensak with a shutter of 1/10 to 1/200 second plus B and T. The "set-o-matic" system couples with focusing distance to automatically compute flash exposure as you focus. Not too shabby for 1953.

I found mine in a box of unclaimed repairs from the camera shop. It had been in non-climate controlled storage for about 15 years, After some Ronsonol cleaning I got the shutter to fire (a bit erratic at first). The film advance jams from time to time so I'm still working on it. Although the front of the camera is compact, it is pretty thick. Here's a top view.

upload_2018-7-24_0-18-29.jpeg.3c14fdd68c8dba88fe3e6ec9d9355aea.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In it's day the Bolsey was one of the most compact non-folding 35's available. It has a 44mm f 3.2 lens made by Wolensak with a shutter of 1/10 to 1/200 second plus B and T. The "set-o-matic" system couples with focusing distance to automatically compute flash exposure as you focus. Not too shabby for 1953.

I found mine in a box of unclaimed repairs from the camera shop. It had been in non-climate controlled storage for about 15 years, After some Ronsonol cleaning I got the shutter to fire (a bit erratic at first). The film advance jams from time to time so I'm still working on it. Although the front of the camera is compact, it is pretty thick. Here's a top view.

[ATTACH=full]1254947[/ATTACH]

Yeah, they're "chunky monkeys". I think I still have one, but it's never worked in the time I've had it, and I don't know much about the cameras. Most sources seem more interested in the company's founder than they are in the cameras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More on the Bolsey: a few years ago Surplus Shed was selling the lens/shutter unit that went in the later Bolsey Jubilee. It had a Steinheil f 2.8, but the shutter still only went to a blistering 1/200. I bought one of the surplus units and it works, but the apertures and shutter speeds are not labeled. I do not believe it will fit my B22 so it's still in the package.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A shot of the 400mm preset that I mentioned earlier in the thread.

upload_2018-8-2_11-40-7.thumb.jpeg.049bd8e54a6c6f0279efa6fcb610ed41.jpeg

For those not familiar with this lens, the preset 400 is long, but lightweight. I usually just stop it down to f 32 and use the open/close ring to continuously vary the aperture until I get what I want. If you want a bit more reach there is also a 500mm f 8 version .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...