Jump to content

Philosophy forum on life support...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh my goodness!

 

You need two wings to fly, Phil.. Birds worked that out way back in time...birds are still flying.

 

Phil, you come over real hard core right. Is that really you? If you are....well, use the freedom of speech that Democracy has given you....no need to hide or be frightened to express your views.

Edited by Allen Herbert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Democracy never gave anyone free speech"...... moving on in some sort of hope.

 

Holy Moses, Batman....there's a new super hero....changed his avatar....but still he is the" crying man" and will drown us all with his tears and snot!

What should we do...he seems so powerful with jets of mucous/snot pouring from his nose.

 

Democracy, gives the platform of free speech, without the platform, there would be no free speech. So, yes, Democracy, has given us free speech...how we respect/honor it is another story.

 

To an ass, a thistle is a delicious fruit.

The ass eats the thistle. It remains an ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democracy, gives the platform of free speech, without the platform, there would be no free speech. So, yes, Democracy, has given us free speech...how we respect/honor it is another story.

That is patently false.

Laughably so.

Take a remedial course in logic or history.

Begin with the French Revolution.

Google “tyranny of the majority” .

Simply visit any college campus where people are shouted down and intimidated by the “democratic majority”.

Educate yourself and you won’t come across as some mouthy uninformed juvenile.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • "...such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."

American founding father Alexander Hamilton, writing to Thomas Jefferson from the Constitutional Convention, argued the same fears regarding the use of pure direct democracy by the majority to elect a demagogue who, rather than work for the benefit of all citizens, set out to either harm those in the minority or work only for those of the upper echelon. The Electoral College mechanism present in the indirect United States presidential electionsystem, and the phenomenon of faithless electors allowed for within it, was, in part, deliberately created as a safety measure not only to prevent such a scenario, but also to prevent the use of democracy to overthrow democracy for an authoritarian, dictatorial or other system of oppressive government.[3] As articulated by Hamilton, one reason the Electoral College was created was so "that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications".[4]

Tyranny of the majority - Wikipedia

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additionally......

From the same link....

 

While James Madison referred to the same idea as "the violence of majority faction" in The Federalist Papers, for example Federalist 10, the phrase "tyranny of the majority" was used by John Adams in 1788.[8] It was also used by Edmund Burke in Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), where he said that "The tyranny of a multitude is a multiplied tyranny." It was further popularised by John Stuart Mill in On Liberty (1859). The Federalist Papers and the phrase (in translation) is used at least once in the first sequel to Human, All Too Human (1879).[9] Ayn Rand wrote that individual rights are not subject to a public vote, and that the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities and "the smallest minority on earth is the individual".[10]

 

We see this playing out in the current atmosphere of Democrat legislators publicly encouraging harassment en masse of anyone expressing a differing political view with the explicit purpose of suppression of speech.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It’s the hook that counts....take the bait but break the hook" Moving know where.

 

Oh my goodness...he thinks his a cowboy...having a shoot out at high noon. And he has a cowboy hat, and full of political correctness...Wyatt Earp of goodness.

Edited by Allen Herbert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...