Jump to content

Help identifying Tiltall tripod


jon_shumpert2

Recommended Posts

I was hoping someone may be able to help me with identifying what model of Tiltall tripod I have. I bought it at a thrift store and it is missing the quick release plate. The tripod is compact and I think it is made out of aluminum. The quick release opening is about 1-1/4" square. The tripod has no other identification other than the name on one leg. I would like to find a quick release plate for it, but if I can't, I will buy a small ballhead so my wife can use it with her Nikon 1 J1. If anyone could help identify it, I would be appreciate it. Thanks.

 

2070451059__DSC0004-Copy.JPG.ceb4ba82453f5dd33f373c9301047e3d.JPG

 

1383507926__DSC0003-Copy.JPG.5ce12f452e279fbdb3dc16cf4d4fc27b.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Does your wife want a ball head?

I personally do not like a ball head. I prefer a pan head. I prefer to have only ONE axis moving at a time, for more control.

Though, a ball head is a bit faster to put the camera onto a subject than a pan head.

I only use a ball head when I want to reduce the carry weight of my tripod, as all my pan heads are heavier.

I realize that head choice is is a personal decision, based on how you shoot and personal preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marchioni from about 1940. Leitz for a reasonable solid approximation of original. Star D for cheap aluminum knock offs. Now I have not idea who uses the name. I would add that a combo of legs and head is less than what the market offers most of the time. And offers less versatility. Yet it was a long lived item for the photographic world we live in. Collets on the Star D were cheap and the parts lacked good fit and finish. But it looked good when I bought it once long ago in

the Loop Chicago. Saved for someone who nags to borrow a tripod, but not to a best friend i hasten to add.. :)

Edited by GerrySiegel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought my Marchioni Tiltall back in the early '70s when I was in high school. It was one of few lightweight tripods that could decently support a 4x5. I still have and use it today, probably one of the better photographic investments I've made. I've never seen the one from the OP. It looks fairly decent, but has nothing in common with the old ones or the knock-offs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was one of few lightweight tripods that could decently support a 4x5.

 

One of the other ones that you can include in that category is the Leitz tabletop tripod. I'm convinced that it's virtually indestructible.

 

With that said, maybe I'm set in my ways but back when I started in photography I had about $100 to spend on a tripod. The new options at that price point aren't(and weren't) that great, but the Marchioni Tilt-All I bought is still with me and in regular use. In fact, I've never had a pressing desire to upgrade it. I've been tempted several times-now that I can-to plunk down the money for a set of Gitzo carbon fiber legs and an Arca-Swiss or RRS ball head, but that gets REALLY expensive when I consider that I want a set of legs tall enough to bring an SLR to eye level without raising the center column(I'm 6'2", and depending on the camera at best only have to raise the Tilt-All an inch or two).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do I know, but this tripod does not look like a "legacy" item from the day when. The materials and construction look quite recent to me.

Here's a tripod in use in 1962 from the Smithsonian Field Office store.

1616943841_SDSully-62sm.jpg.1446cf5caf2d0545d9b18889ab8aeb43.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can get a lot of information, as well as spare parts, from this site: Tiltall Tripod Support. Much more useful than the company that now produces the tripods named Tiltalls. I have three old Tiltalls, one each from Marchioni, Leitz and Star D. Just from eyeballing them, it seems that the Marchioni-made one used beefier parts than the Leitz, at least the part around the collar that the legs attach to - not that there's anything flimsy about the latter. So Leitz was a downgrade :).
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...