Andy Murphy Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Thinking of buying the 28e. Have AIS 28 f2 8 which I like for lite weight and performance at f4 and 5.6. Thanks in advance for opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Helmke Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 What is your reason for considering the E lens? Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Murphy Posted January 29, 2018 Author Share Posted January 29, 2018 I now have a D850 and assume the 28e can better maximize performance than the AIS lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photo_galleries Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 If I were a hardcore 28mm shooter with a D850 and if I had the cash, I would get this. If I were a sometime 28mm shooter, I'd consider the 28mm/1.8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 At 2 grand in price, and a pound and a half in weight, I think you'd have to be seriously in love with the 28mm focal length and desperate for the extra stop of aperture to even consider this lens. If the little AI-S 28mm f/2.8 has served well so far, why not give it a chance on the D850 and just see if it's lacking in any way? I have the AI-S 28mm f/2, which performs about the same as the f/2.8, and it serves OK on a D800. For the, presumably handheld, work where a 28mm f/1.4 would come into its own, I really don't see how super optical quality is going to be the foremost consideration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilkka_nissila Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I haven't used the new 28mm but eventually plan on acquiring it. I think when hand holding a lens at a wide aperture in low light, the photographer needs all the help the equipment can give to reach good enough image quality at f/1.4. This includes autofocus that is the most accurate in low light, and a lens that gives satisfactory sharpness and nice out of focus blur (as well as the transition between the two). I think with wide angles of f/1.4 the biggest challenge is in sufficiently accurate autofocusing in dim lighting conditions. When hand holding a wide angle using a sufficiently fast shutter speed that freezes subject movement, camera shake won't be an issue. Of course there are also other options to consider including the 28/1.8 AF-S, the 28/1.4 AF-D (second hand), and other adjacent focal lengths such as 24mm and 35mm primes. I would get the 28/1.8 only if you never expect to use the manual focus ring. It has the advantage of light weight (which can be a real benefit if you work with a number of lenses, the total weight does add up quickly). The 28/1.4 AF D is quite rare and maybe it has some collector value keeping prices up, as I said I think the crucial issue is the most precise and accurate AF you can get when working at f/1.4, and for that kind of use I am sure the AF-S motor is more precise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 "I would get the 28/1.8 only if you never expect to use the manual focus ring." - What makes you say that Ilkka? If you think you're getting a brighter viewfinder image at f/1.4, then you're sorely mistaken. Plus it's been shown time after time that residual SA in wide aperture lenses actually makes open aperture optical focussing more problematic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeBu Lamar Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I don't know but when I use a 28mm I generally use it stop down quite a bit so the large aperture isn't important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dieter Schaefer Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 "I would get the 28/1.8 only if you never expect to use the manual focus ring." - What makes you say that Ilkka? Ilkka might be referring to the little bit of play of the coupling of the ring to the actual focus unit; i.e. when focuusing manually and especially when reversing focus direction with the focus ring, there is a bit of play until the ring actually "catches" and follows the movement of the focus ring - quite annoying when one is used to the "tightness" of a manual focus Nikkor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShunCheung Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 I have never used the 28mm/f1.4 E AF-S so that I won't comment on its quality. I bought the 28mm/f1.8 AF-S a few years ago and that is a decent lens, very light in weight. For those who would like to look a little further ahead that Nikon may get into mirrorless offerings, most likely those future bodies will not have the mechanical aperture control and will have a new mount with a shorter registration distance since there is no mirror to get in the way. The advantage of E is that any future adapter will be simpler without the need of any built-in motor to move the aperture mechanism. The down side is that retro-focus wide angle lenses designed for SLRs are not necessarily optimized for mirrorless cameras. If one is only concerned about using this new wide angle on F-mount DSLRs such as the D850, all of that is a moot point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now