erko_podbicanin Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erko_podbicanin Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Gammill Posted November 20, 2017 Author Share Posted November 20, 2017 A few more. Dak, Minolta XE-5, 50mm f1.7 MC Rokkor, FP4+ Tracks by a fence, same gear and film across the street from the Grill 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcelRomviel Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Himatic 7S AGFA APX400 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossb Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Hiking around Point Lobos today. 120 Tri-x at 800 in D76 1:1 for 12 min. Yellow #8 with Circular polarizer 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossb Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) One more shot. Same roll. Edited November 21, 2017 by rossb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davecaz Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Great start to the week! We finally had some more settled weather this past week and I managed to get a couple of films shot. Here are some frames from a Bronica S2a fitted with the 135mm Nikkor-Q f/3.5 lens; the film was Ilford HP5 Plus developed in PMK Pyro and scanned on an Epson V700 Photo using Silverfast SE software. At f/3.5... Rick - It could just be a trick of my memory, but this set seems to be even more stunning than your usual standard. I wasn't sure that was possible. But, these seem to have just a tad more detail and contrast than I recall being your standard. But, now I'm seeing the set shot with the Canon FD T70 fitted with a Tamron Adaptall II 35-135mm, and they also seem to have a bit more edge than I recall being your standard. I could just be getting senile, I suppose. Or did you possibly tweak your processing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davecaz Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 One more shot. Same roll. [ATTACH=full]1220248[/ATTACH] Ross - It's nice to see someone using not just one, but two filters, and doing it properly :) Makes me feel like less of an anachronism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davecaz Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Well done Rick! We had a very windy weekend. This is what happens in our coast when the wind comes. Cars get a nice wash when the wave comes. Nikon F2 with 50/1.4, FP4+ in DK-50 (just found an old can). Nice shot, Julio! Do you mind if I ask where this is? It looks like a fun place to visit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossb Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Ross - It's nice to see someone using not just one, but two filters, and doing it properly :) Makes me feel like less of an anachronism. Thank you for your comment. Stacking 2 filters is a good thing but I must admit that my wife gets a bit bored while I fiddle around. I forgot my tripod quick release yesterday is the reason I shot at 800. Just to get the shutter speed up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davecaz Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Thank you for your comment. Stacking 2 filters is a good thing but I must admit that my wife gets a bit bored while I fiddle around. I forgot my tripod quick release yesterday is the reason I shot at 800. Just to get the shutter speed up. You're welcome. I didn't notice the shutter speed, and wouldn't have found it unusual unless I really thought about it. Living in Arizona, speeds in the thousands are normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_drawbridge Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) davecaz said: Rick - It could just be a trick of my memory, but this set seems to be even more stunning than your usual standard. I wasn't sure that was possible. But, these seem to have just a tad more detail and contrast than I recall being your standard. But, now I'm seeing the set shot with the Canon FD T70 fitted with a Tamron Adaptall II 35-135mm, and they also seem to have a bit more edge than I recall being your standard. I could just be getting senile, I suppose. Or did you possibly tweak your processing? Thanks, Dave! The Ilford FP4 Plus I used for the series with the T70 is particularly suited to development in the PMK Pyro but it's more costly than the Arista or Kentmere I usually use. Other than that, nothing changed. I'm pleased you liked the pics. Edited November 21, 2017 by rick_drawbridge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossb Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 You're welcome. I didn't notice the shutter speed, and wouldn't have found it unusual unless I really thought about it. Living in Arizona, speeds in the thousands are normal. I seem to hover around 1/60th a lot using filters in daylight. Of course it depends on which one or combination. For landscapes I tend to shoot at f22 with the Mamiya which certainly takes a bite out of your shutter speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio Fernandez Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 (edited) Davecaz, this is Montevideo city in Uruguay, and the place is in the South Rambla near the Old City. The Rambla is a seaside (or riverside, because it is the River Plate, technically an estuary) avenue. Not the best place to be in a windy day or storm but very, very nice in good weather. Edited November 26, 2017 by Julio Fernandez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now