JDMvW Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 History of America in hole-punched photos Stryker "edited" with a "punch" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norman 202 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 unless like in one example when there's a hole straight on someone's face. get some PS wizard to replace the hole with, I don’t know, an apple? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Peri Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Roy Stryker should have been taken out and severely beaten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supriyo Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Roy Stryker should have been taken out and severely beaten. While I don't condone violence, this reflects my thinking too. Punching hard in the face was what I was thinking about. Probably he saw the dumbness of his attitude later on and stopped doing that, as the article reports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Peri Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Probably he saw the dumbness of his attitude later on and stopped doing that, as the article reports. Hmm... he probably got beaten up, so he stopped... http://bayouline.com/o2.gif 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted November 18, 2017 Author Share Posted November 18, 2017 PS wizard to replace the hole with, I don’t know, an apple I'm no wizard, though I am a long-time Photoshop user. Here is a quck-and-dirty "repair" of one of the images: Maybe the hole is better? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supriyo Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Maybe the hole is better? Certainly not! This is way better. Proof that aliens exist and they were also documenting the US during depression (that's your face you cloned in I presume) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chazfenn Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 I must confess I've done this exactly once in my life. I worked as a ship's photographer for a while. We took lots of pics & sold them for $3:50 US a pop for a 5X7" print with a 3-color logo of the ship, cruise number & date. We lived exclusively on the commission of $0.35 per. Block-booking for groups or Companies was normal, as was "Working passage" in some form or another. Entertainers in particular found this a good way to get a paid break. On this particular series of cruises we had a (I'm being as PC as I can here, bear with me) a certain ethnic group of fashion models from a major city in the United States North-East. They were "working passage" by putting on multiple fashion shows during the trip. We were specifically asked to heavily photograph both the shows & the entire staff, models & support. We did so. They purchased exactly nothing, not one image. At the end of the 4-week season they suddenly produced a lawyer citing copyright as the fashions were all “copyrighted, patented & trademarked” & demanded both all the prints & all the negatives. Not just of the shows either, he wanted every image even those of them taking shore excursions & so on as we couldn't guarantee that a copyrighted garment wasn't in them. Yes it was a setup. We were conned for several thousand dollars. The prints we shipped to out home office weekly (waste & materials control) so we didn't have any of them, except for the last (current) weeks set. They were shipped free by the line by whatever route had space available. Sometimes it took 3 or 4 months to reach the office. The negatives we kept for reprint orders & they went home every 6 months or so. We checked the actual wording of the papers & it specified “100% of all materials, both film & others, as relevant". I personally punched every single negative of over 75 rolls of 135-36 & placed them in a 100' film can. We then had them count the punch dots to the frame count to verify it was indeed 100% of the film. I'd do it again under the same circumstances too. Perhaps one day the prints will finally make it to home office so we can forward them also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James G. Dainis Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 chazfan, Good work. I hope the loss of photos set them back on their butts. James G. Dainis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Helmke Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 I don't know there chazfenn, that sounds like a lot of work there. Had it been me they might well have found the film at the bottom of the ocean. Rick H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Vongries Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 they might well have found the film at the bottom of the ocean. "I fought the law and the law won." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chazfenn Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 I don't know there chazfenn, that sounds like a lot of work there. Had it been me they might well have found the film at the bottom of the ocean. Rick H. But then they could have sued us & possibly even won. This way we were legally compliant but they didn't succeed either. It was worth the effort. Besides the industry was under enough scrutiny for environmental issues.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now