Jump to content

Silica Gel Reuse


Sanford

Recommended Posts

Do it Sanford, if it makes you feel good. As to keeping your camera and lenses drier, I doubt if there will be any measurable help there. At least that is my experience and that of people I have worked with. Large commercial silica is a different story. But no, nothing wrong with doing that. Costs nothing. Hurts nothing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see any reason not to take the silica gel packet from an empty pill bottle or shoe box etc, and toss it into your camera bag?

 

One reason is, specifically those gel packets which are in "pill bottles" are (in some jurisdictions) subject to laws: in broad summary that is for them to be contained in what amounts to a "child proof container" or "upon opening said container to be discarded carefully".

 

One's camera bag represents neither of those situations. I can envisage easily the possibility of litigation if a kid picked up and swallowed a "pill packet silica gel" that was laying in my camera bag.

 

Additionally, little (i.e. small) gel packets such as those in pill bottles would not serve much purpose in what amounts to be a relatively much larger volume camera bag. Those gels sachets found in shoe boxes vary in size, at least here they do. The bigger ones would (obviously) have more clout in a camera bag, provided that you dried them out regularly.

 

Note that when any gels get filled up with moisture then basically you have a lot of little bags of moisture, in your camera bag - I have no idea if the gels can get weary and subsequently that moisture can leak out - but it is a reasonable question to ponder.

 

On the broader topic, I have found that "air flow" is the general key to keeping lenses and cameras in a 'dry' condition - so leaving your camera bag open (anecdotally, most people leave their gear in a closed bag) and in a room (not a cupboard) and against an internal wall which is away from the kitchen and the bathroom is my general practice rather than dumping silica gels into it. My camera 'cupboards' have always had good airflow (holes are purpose made for that airflow) and are situated as per the above description.

 

That's my successful formula and generally I have always lived and worked near the ocean (walking distance or a tad farther) and whilst not tropical but certainly in relatively humid environs.

 

WW

Edited by William Michael
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may catch flack for this, but if someone's kid chokes on something that they extracted from my camera bag--I call it karma.

 

Maybe I should take the change out of my pockets lest some little tyke reach in and end up asphyxiating on a quarter or a pipe lighter...

 "I See Things..."

The FotoFora Community Experience [Link]

A new community for creative photographers.  Come join us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silica gel degrades into fine, highly abrasive dust. Repeated regeneration will cause degradation. Silica gel adsorbs water to a very low level, but has very little capacity. It's main use is to scavenge moisture from sealed containers. Recall that you find them in gear wrapped tightly in plastic bags, not wrapped around cameras. If your camera bag is opened as often as mine, forget about using silica gel pouches. Sporting goods shops sell strip or tubular heaters for gun cases.

 

If you live in an extremely humid environment, consider buying or constructing a dry box. It doesn't need a desiccant, just a source of heat to keep it 15 degrees or so above ambient. That lowers the relative humidity and drives moisture out of absorbent materials.

 

 

I may catch flack for this, but if someone's kid chokes on something that they extracted from my camera bag--I call it karma.

Get a life! There must be a dozen things in a camera bag for a toddler to choke on. Coins nave an enduring fascination for them. Keep the bag zipped and put away. Once kids are over two, they lose that oral fixation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... no serious flak from me. (pretty sure its "flak" - maybe that's just the English spelling and the American spelling is 'flack' for both meanings - that's not a criticism, but a question)

 

anyway...

 

I am not keen on any kid choking for whatever reason.

But I am also not keen on me being legally responsible to stop kids delving into my kit of gear and extracting stuff from it when I should have disposed of those little gel buggers "responsibly".

 

But (as I think that you know), my general point was laws are laws - and law can be a funny thing that can bite one in the bum.

 

Also these little points, I think, continue to provide a realization that it is not the same situation across all the places in the world where PN members live: as a few other examples I have previously used: Copyright is not necessarily automatically acquired by the Professional Wedding Photographer when the shutter is released; Return of a purchase because of change of mind, is not necessarily a Consumer's right; In some locations there is not the right of Photographers to make images of people in public places, etc.

 

In any case, my view is that the little silica gels in a camera bag will do three-eighths, of two-fifths, of bugger-all. (that's Strine for "not much bloody use at all")

 

WW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ed, you have it right. The capacity of these bags is limited, and does not stand the test of repeated dehydration.

 

By the way, I HAVE A LIFE, thank you. I am spending much of it in here with you, darling...

 

hearticon.jpg.c6f1089d2e2133b7dd405c00975ec187.jpg

Edited by PapaTango

 "I See Things..."

The FotoFora Community Experience [Link]

A new community for creative photographers.  Come join us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is kind of baroque, the concerns about swallowing. But the wee packets does no good in open bags exposed to human breath and dog breath and what you have in your garden growing...I have seen the results of even large silica in sealed containers....beautiful mint Alpa destroyed for instance... Be smart, San, keep air circulation if it is microbials and fungi you have in mind. There are camera bugs that speciaize in gear They find lens cement tastyw a side of silica and the adhesive on leatherette absolutely scrumptuous. UV A is a great anti microbial. Bake the lenses for 20 minutes a month. It will give you more Vitamin D as well. Alooha Edited by GerrySiegel
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too small, wrong type and the camera bag isn't sealed well enough. I keep my stuff in a dehumidified room when not in use. My older collectible stuff (probably worth $1.98 these days) lives in a plastic storage bin in the same room with a big towel that gets dried in the dryer periodically. Seems to have worked well over the years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I HAVE A LIFE, thank you. I

Thanks, LOL

 

Life is too short to invent things to worry about. Leave that to the product liability and personal injury lawyers. It's not limited to children. My wife put some of those brightly colored gel-packs of dishwashing detergent in a candy jar. Almost got me ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silica gel adsorbs water to a very low level, but has very little capacity. It's main use is to scavenge moisture from sealed containers

 

Truth be told, I've always wondered about why it has even fallen into common use as a dessicant.

 

In the lab, we have a large choice of dessicants and many labs will even have bulk quantities of silica gel on hand. I rarely-if ever-recall anyone using it as a dessicant and that's even in an environment that's sealed pretty tightly. I'll go out on a limb and say that at least in my world, calcium sulfate is by far and away the most common dessicant and I've even gone so far as to use it to keep silica gel dry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everyone. Growing up in Hawaii with it's various critters & growths, keeping cameras protected was a job. First it was white rice in a sock in the camera bag when not used, and when silica gel packets & freezer bags came upon the scene, they where welcomed. For the last 6 years or so with my "snow birding" back n forth to my Ohana in Hawaii, or here in Puget Sound, I have used the following procedure with great luck. . no fungi or corrosion of anything. Large freezer bag (1 gal), 2oz packet of silica gel, 1 cotton ball with 70% alcohol (semi dry). Into this place a camera, without lens, or a lens. Close freezer bag & put into another freezer bag. Seal's on this bag are covered with black electrical tape.

Why is this "procedure" done on both sides of the Pacific? Puget Sound is another death trap for unused camera equipment. Cold & Wet = critters of all types !!

When I fly back to either abode, I unwrap the cameras, fire up the oven for a pizza and re-generate the silica gel packs while warming the oven, and the next day I am back to photography. All films are popped into the freezer during any absence. Enjoy, Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the lab, we have a large choice of dessicants and many labs will even have bulk quantities of silica gel on hand. I rarely-if ever-recall anyone using it as a dessicant and that's even in an environment that's sealed pretty tightly. I'll go out on a limb and say that at least in my world, calcium sulfate is by far and away the most common dessicant and I've even gone so far as to use it to keep silica gel dry.

You mean calcium chloride, which has high capacity but leaves a relatively high vapor pressure. It is cheap, easily reconstituted, and amenable for use with a dye which changes from blue to pink as the desiccant is exhausted. It also sheds a lot of dust and is highly corrosive.

 

Calcium sulphate sans water is called "plaster of paris," which I have never seen used as a desiccant. Calcium carbonate is used, but has both low capacity and low efficiency.

 

Silica gel would remove water from Ca based desiccants, not the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean calcium chloride, which has high capacity but leaves a relatively high vapor pressure. It is cheap, easily reconstituted, and amenable for use with a dye which changes from blue to pink as the desiccant is exhausted. It also sheds a lot of dust and is highly corrosive.

 

Calcium sulphate sans water is called "plaster of paris," which I have never seen used as a desiccant. Calcium carbonate is used, but has both low capacity and low efficiency.

 

Silica gel would remove water from Ca based desiccants, not the other way around.

 

Nope, we rarely use calcium chloride. It's deliquescent, so it just tends to make a mess. Even if it doesn't absorb enough water to completely liquify, it still clumps badly. The only common application I'm aware of for it is to maintain a dry atmosphere in reaction vessel by way of a drying tube. Even doing it that way is MOSTLY for pedagogical applications(i.e. the Grignard reaction in organic teaching labs) as most research labs would prefer to use dry nitrogen or argon.

 

Anhydrous calcium sulfate is sold commercially under the trade name DrieRite. It's available both in indicating form(with cobalt chloride) and non-indicating form. Again, I'll go out on a limb and say that in my corner of the world(several different institutions) it's the most common dessicant in use. It has a high dessicating capacity and can be regenerated at around 230ºC. Usually, when I'm doing something like filling a dessicator with new Drierite, I'll mostly use the non-indicating version and sprinkle some indicating Drierite on top. Stuff that's been regenerated tends to be more evenly mixed.

 

Next to that, we also use molecular sieves, although they tend to work better to dry liquids than air. They are easier to handle as their regeneration temperature is lower and are also not dusty. One notable exception I'll mention is the in-line scrubbers I use on my gas chromatographs, which use a combination of mol sieves and indicating Drierite.

 

I've also been known to use more unconventional dessicants depending on the application. As an example, I've been known to use sodium metal to dry ethyl ether, although we eliminate the need to do that now by buying guaranteed anhydrous ether in Aldrich Sure-Seal bottles or equivalent.

 

On the whole, though, we just don't use silica gel is a dessicant despite-as I mentioned-buying it by the kilogram. It gets used almost exclusively for chromatography applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've used molecular sieves to dry compressed air systems for manufacturing. They absorb water from air under pressure, and are then regenerated by discharging low pressure air through them, almost like perpetual motion, except for entropy.

 

I guess I never read the label on Drierite. It's pelletized so that it has a high surface area and remains relatively dust-free. I've been away from a lab for so many years it all seems like a dream. I passed up a job on uranium enrichment to make pills and liquids for 30 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A temperature and moisture controlled room would be ideal. Air conditioning is the ultimate anti microbial environment in Hawaii. it may be I got bum dope but I do the "baking" so to speak of lenses and some prism gadgets every so often. Funny that some never show contamination and others get fungal spots, mostly small ones. Spots on a 20 yr old lens ,I do not sweat. Fibers or tentacled spread between elements indicate a spreading of the fungi and then it might, (not must,) affect the images. A pen light examination will likely ruin your day==golly there is DUST in there-help etc etc.. I have had one lens professionally disassembled by Canon repair and cleaned and lo it now has some fuzz again in five years. To say this is a generic problem is not exaggeration. But not inevitable Some lenses remain free after 30 years. Go figure. Following a lot of years with a lot of gear, I still have not advice that I can stand firmly behind. Except, in Hawaii, it is not smart to store optics in leather or even vinyl anything. Air circulation and take the critters out for a brief direct sun bath cannot hurt. Edited by GerrySiegel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the long term, air conditioning (humidity control) is beneficial. After an overnight soak in a cool room, it can take a long time to warm up enough to avoid condensation when you go out into the humid outdoors. When possible, I left my camera bag zipped overnight, which helped retain the heat of the previous day. My greatest fear was if condensation were to occur inside the lens, it could take a really long time to dissipate. It hasn't happened, but it could.

 

I worked a couple of years in Puerto Rico, where the dew point would reach 93 degrees (6 degrees above skin temperature). I can't imagine what Hawaii would be like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that in order to keep the lawyers at bay, you should probably enclose the thing (whatever that thing is, I have forgotten by this point in the story) in sealed wax and carefully enclose it in concrete w/ a large warning that says, well, WARNING I guess. Then carefully bury it in the desert somewhere w/ a coded message as how to find it and legally extract it from Mother Earth. Or shoot, why not just do what our government does with radioactive waste? Throw it in lots of big 'ol steel drums and bury it somewheres in the New Mexico desert. Or throw it into the oceans in barrels, along w/ about a dozen other countries between 1946 and 1993. We will avoid discussing where the radioactive waste from the Fukushima little snafu will be thrown :]

 

Ed, I lived in both places, and the only thing I can compare Puerto Rico's humidity and dew points to would be places in the Deep South and Florida. Hawaii, thankfully, usually has the trades, so things are not nearly as brutal there. Of course, there are those two active volcanoes on the Big Island, the tsunami concerns, the VOG from said active volcanoes, the locals, etc. So its always gonna be something, but it probably will not be silica gel packets. What I learned from life in those humid climates was that it wasn't so much that the A/C made things cooler, but that it took the moisture out of the air, which sure as heck made you feel cooler.

 

But even in Hawaii, the last time I threw a leather belt into the top of a closet in Kea'au (where there was little to no air circulation), a month later I took it down and it had turned from a nice leather brown to moldy green.

Edited by steve_mareno|1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...