rwa757 Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 I do not have a quality printer at home nor do I have a quality local service. Any suggestions on what labs do quality work to print from digital files? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen_h Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 There are plenty of good quality inkjet printers for low prices. Many for about the price of the included ink cartridges. Sometimes I still prefer wet processed digital prints, as it reminds me some of the old way. How high of quality do you want? Shutterfly does prints of all sizes, but the price increases fast with size. Maybe not museum quality, but good enough for what I often want, such as sending pictures of kids to their grandparents. They have specials often enough, that I rarely pay the list price. -- glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_richards Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 I have used MPIX over the years and have been pleased with their work. Photo Prints | Quality Photo Printing | Print Your Photos Online : Mpix GR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitaldog Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 If quality to you means having the ability to fully use color management, soft proof and pick how the image gets converted to the output color space, instead of having to send sRGB (suboptimal), check out this list: Digital photo lab profiles Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad_ Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 White House Custom Colour. 1 www.citysnaps.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddler4 Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 I use Bay Photo in the rare cases when I don't print my own and have been entirely satisfied Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_rochkind Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 Adoramapix. They will adjust your file, or you can download a printer profile for color management, with soft proofing. And, great service. Read this: Incredibly good service from Adoramapix.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitaldog Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Adoramapix. They will adjust your file, or you can download a printer profile for color management, with soft proofing. And, great service. Read this: Incredibly good service from Adoramapix.com Too bad you can’t use the profile further. Same with WHCC; profile for soft proofing, can’t use it for conversions, must send sRGB or Adobe RGB (1998). Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bredhog Posted December 30, 2020 Share Posted December 30, 2020 really helpful discussion . thankyou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
httpwww.photo.netbarry Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 I"ve used Samy's camera near me. On any kind of large print they would;d do a proof print and I got good prints from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bredhog Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 share your best custom printing services. Need suggestion about custom printing. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgelfand Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 I do not print that often, but when I do, I use Costco. Costco profiles their printers and maintains them so they match the published profiles. I post process in either Lightroom or Photoshop, convert to the appropriate Costco profile, upload the resulting file, and go pick up my prints either later that day or the next day. Since the profiles are specific for a particular store, you must pick up the prints; mail order is from a central site that does not publish profiles. All my prints match what I see on my screen - at least to my (old) eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted December 31, 2020 Share Posted December 31, 2020 Here is a part of a report by Herbert Keppler in Pop Photo 1992-07. Some 47% poor or unacceptable. That was before digital had kicked in and explains, in part, why so many of us went digital between 2000 and 2005. It is not easier to find good B&W processing today. One might have thought a kind of selection process would have eliminated the poor quality labs, but it only eliminated the more costly processing. My very first roll of Panatomic X film through my then-brand-new Pentax H2 in 1960 came back with scratches, spots, and bug silhouettes. I soon learned to do my own work when I could. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Peri Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 ...It is not easier to find good B&W processing today. I've had excellent results using Dwayne's Photo Lab in Parsons, KS. See: Dwayne’s Photo – A trusted name in photo processing for over 60 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 Here is a part of a report by Herbert Keppler in Pop Photo 1992-07. Some 47% poor or unacceptable. [ATTACH=full]1370338[/ATTACH] That was before digital had kicked in and explains, in part, why so many of us went digital between 2000 and 2005. It is not easier to find good B&W processing today. One might have thought a kind of selection process would have eliminated the poor quality labs, but it only eliminated the more costly processing. My very first roll of Panatomic X film through my then-brand-new Pentax H2 in 1960 came back with scratches, spots, and bug silhouettes. I soon learned to do my own work when I could. In my experience a lot of labs catering to professionals have gone out of business since their market mostly disappeared. Pros would spend for quality work since it made them look good and they were billing their clients for the prints. Amateurs, on the other hand are paying out of their own pockets and are understandably more price sensitive. Good labs are charging you for the inevitable remakes in their prices, otherwise they won't stay in business. My first and last rolls of B&W film developed by a commercial lab were also Panatomic-X and showed lots of grain in 3 1/2 x 5 prints. There are a couple of custom labs that I would trust now, but since I can develop it myself that's what I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted January 1, 2021 Share Posted January 1, 2021 I should have mentioned Dwayne's also. Perhaps I was subconsciously wanting them to be even faster with my own film so.... Black and white, however, I do at home, unfortunately when I get to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now