Jump to content

Developing Agfapan APX Films


tony_doucet

Recommended Posts

I have used Tetenal ultrafine for 100 and 25 that worked fine for me, it should work for 400 as well. its a very finegrained film with nice tones

I would like a little more contrast. but the detailes in shadow and light areas are so fine, that I put up with it.

With ultrafine, you can not push nor pull.

Try it. The times recomended is all right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently shot some APX 25, 100 and 400.

I processed in dilute Xtol.

 

<p>

 

APX400 impressed me as being a very decent

film; sharp, finer grain than Tri-X but not

not as good as TMax400 in either department,

and not as good as HP5+ in terms of grain.

 

<p>

 

 

APX100 is a nice medium speed film, probably

better than Plus-X in grain, sharpness and

tonality, but not close to TMax100.

 

<p>

 

APX25, ahh, talk about the classic fine-grain

look, albeit with a pronounced shoulder that

flattens highlight contrast. I usually prefer

a straight-line look but APX25 can be pretty

cool when used on skin in hard light - have a

look at http://www.source.net/dana/photo.html

for 'Velvet', shot on APX25 135 for an example.

 

<p>

 

Dana K6JQ

Dana@Source.Net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 19 years later...

The last of the Afga film made before Afga Gavaert closed the photography division was sold off in 2005 or 2006, it is labled Agfapan APX.

The Agfa film made by license from Agfa Photo, the reresucted company, is labled Agfaphoto APX.

These are easier to distinguish than Kodak films.

Agfa Photo is also responcible for the reintroduction of Rodinal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...