Jump to content

Zeiss Mutar 2x vs. Hasselblad 2XE


cabophoto

Recommended Posts

I´m currently looking for a 2x converter, mainly for use with my

Hasselblad Sonnar 180/4 CFi. I know there´s the current Hasselblad

2XE, but a Zeiss Mutar 2x is available used. Does anyone know about

the optical performance of the two ?

 

Many thanks in advance

 

Carsten

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is the Zeiss Mutar was optimized for the Zeiss CF 350 Sonnar (although it could give good results with shorter lenses), while the Hasselblad 2XE is optimized for the shorter telephotos, and is particularly good with the 180 CFi. (This is according to Ernst Wildi's latest Hasselblad Guide, 5th edition.)

 

I have used the Hasselblad 1.4XE and it is quite good. I presume you know that the new converters are assembled in Sweden using optics sourced in Japan (presumably from the Fuji group)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Hasselblad litterature, the Zeiss Mutar 2x was optimized for the 350 <b>F</b>. It works extremly well with the 180 CF (and therefore with a 180 CFi). This fact is well known and I can confirm it from experience.

 

I unfortunately can't answer from experience to the accurate question, which is Mutar versus 2xE on specific lenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...