daniel_tong1 Posted August 26, 2016 Share Posted August 26, 2016 <blockquote> <p>I went to a wetland in Toronto (north) last Sunday and I took only a short DA 200mm. Took a few images and some of them looked to me 'missed' shots like this one. I was really far away indeed.</p> <p><img src="http://www.pbase.com/danieltong/image/163913340/large.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="532" /></p> <p>Later on at home I cloned out the distraction and did some cropping. The sort of resolution of the lens was impressive indeed (at least to my eyes)<br> <img src="http://www.pbase.com/danieltong/image/163912495/original.jpg" alt="" width="2076" height="1396" /></p> <p>Daniel, Toronto</p> </blockquote> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemked Posted August 27, 2016 Share Posted August 27, 2016 <p>I'm not quite sure what the 'missed' issue is about. Considering that this was a flying bird and as it is only a 200mm you needed to crop pretty heavily it looks pretty good to me.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kuhne Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 <p>I agree with Doug, and with your own comment- the resolution looks impressive to me also. The DA* 200mm f/2.8 is certainly a fine lens. But what was your shutter speed?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel_tong1 Posted August 29, 2016 Author Share Posted August 29, 2016 Doug & Michael, Thanks for commenting. The details are all in the exif http://www.pbase.com/danieltong/image/163912495 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now