Jump to content

Nikon Wednesday 2016: #12


Matt Laur

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

<p>Good Wednesday to all!</p>

<p>Patterns in a art glass window<br>

<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1673/25877738682_4243046b8f_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /><br>

<strong>Nikon D7100, AF Nikkor 60mm f2.8 Micro, f8 @ 1/160, ISO 400</strong><br>

<strong> </strong><br>

<strong><img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1689/25877771622_67ce9014d0_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /></strong><br>

<strong><strong>Nikon D7100, AF Nikkor 60mm f2.8 Micro, f8 @ 1/160, ISO 400</strong></strong><br>

<strong><strong> </strong></strong><br>

Raindrops -<br>

<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1505/25698103760_d07d45e2a8_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="427" /><br>

<strong><strong>Nikon D7100, AF Nikkor 60mm f2.8 Micro, f8 @ 1/320, ISO 1000</strong></strong><br>

<strong><strong> </strong></strong><br>

Mike :D</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p>I do not think the VW beetle has ever had a split windshield - the back windows yes -:)</p>

</blockquote>

<p>I was a kid growing in the 1960's. By then, most cars from that era already had a one-piece windshield. While I could very well be wrong, as a kid, the way I understood it was that earlier, the technology to make a large piece of glass wasn't available (or at least not available economically) such that the windshield had to be split into two smaller pieces, right and left. Or perhaps in some cases the windshield was smaller.</p>

<p>Maybe someone more senior with earlier knowledge can provide a better explanation.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The reason for two pane windshields was not so much the size of glass involved as the difficulty and expense of curving it, especially without distortion. Many older vehicles had flat single pane windshields (I once, for example, had a "little deuce coupe," AKA a '32 Ford, with one) but to get a better side view one must either curve it, or put two flat pieces at an angle. </p>

<p>Meanwhile since this is a picture thread, I'll throw in another. I got an ancient 135/2.8 lens not too long ago, and finally got around to using it, and though it's a bit long for the DX format and a bit hard to focus well on a cloudy day, I kind of like the way it registers stuff. Probably not going to displace the 105, but worth trying a bit more. </p><div>00dqfl-561903684.jpg.e986a4d9fb2c1150d6681e8d562f6077.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the compliment Kyle B. Keeping the camera at the ready is a definite must with two

quick moving little ones. Those are some nice shots of your sons. I'm hoping I'll get a few more

keepers when my girls get a little older and can understand directions and, maybe, sit still for a

second. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...