Jump to content

501CM vs 503CX vs 503CW


peter_samson

Recommended Posts

<p>Am considering jumping in and buying some used stuff. Any of the three bodies seem OK to me (501CM, 503CX, 503CW). Would anyone recommend one over the other?<br>

My use will probably be outdoor, no wedding photography, and likely paired with the 50mm (or 60mm?) or 80mm lens.<br>

Thx,<br>

Peter</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Quick answer -<br>

503cx is much older than the other two - 503cx run ended in 1994; the other two began in 1996/7.<br>

501cm is 'entry level' compared to 503cw. Main advantage of the latter is availability of an electric winder.<br>

Hassy kits come with 80mm so if you want a 50 you'll need to go for separates. The earliest lens models you should be looking at are CFs.<br>

If you haven't done so already pay a visit to Hasselbald Historical, http://www.hasselbladhistorical.eu/ and the Hasselblad bit at http://www.photoethnography.com<br>

I have a 503cx and a 205fcc. The cx is a fantastic well-built, manual, camera. The cm and cw equally so. But I would recommend the last one (if you have the funds) just because of the age factor.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The bigger mirror that avoids vignetting in the viewfinder e.g. with longer lenses is the main argument to go either for the 501CM or 503CW. The 503CW offers a TTL-flash sensor and can be used with a winder. I really do not like that winder but TTL-flash can be an advantage in certain situations.<br>

Ulrik</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's advantage of TTL metering? It never seems to be accurate in my experience. Oh, and what do you not like about the removable winder? I have never used one, and personally use an ELM, which I love!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>TTL flash metering can be useful in macro photography as it avoids the problem of working out exposure compensation with extention tubes or bellows. Also a good reason to choose a model with the larger mirror as it avoids viewfinder cut off with the added lens extension of close up accessories. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I found the Winder CW I once tested to be in the way when using it e.g. with my 50 mm Distagon. For me a EL-/ELM/ELX/ELD-camera is a much better choice for motorized shooting.<br>

Ulrik</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 5 years later...

<p>I guess the advantage of the meter knob is that you do not have to bring a separate handheld meter. You probably want to slide it off the camera to take the reading anyways, right?<br>

I often shoot filters. I think a metered prism would be my preference since it meters TTL.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

<blockquote>

<p>"the 503cx will allow the use of a meter knob which I have found to be an excellent combination. <br>

I believe the 501 and the 503cw do not permit" <em><strong>Bill L.</strong></em></p>

</blockquote>

<p>Actually there is a work-around. <br>

Hasselblad offered a handly little accessory that allows the meter knob to attach to the front edge of their square lens hood. </p>

<div>00eBaG-565935184.jpg.1a73bcac6eb40f7687fc68f6dbcd7ec1.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...