Jump to content

Problems with Nikon Df Exposure Compensation Dial


scott_mclean3

Recommended Posts

<p>I purchased a Nikon Df in March 2014. I have shot about 22000 pictures so far with it and the image quality is impressive (my previous camera was a D300s and I also use a D800 at work). The Nikon D800 I use has about 10000 shots on it, no problems so far. I do find at low light the Df is clearly superior to the D800 particularly for moving subjects. I have shot about 50000 pictures with my D300 in some pretty rough conditions (yes I even dropped it) and never had a problem. Unfortunately, I have to admit the I have to admit though the design of the Df camera is fairly poor. The Df has gone back to Nikon twice in the 8 months I owned it and I really did not expect that from a camera of this level. In fact I have never, ever had to have a camera repaired in my life and I shoot in some pretty tough conditions. Both problems with the Df were with the exposure compensation dial (this to me says design flaw). After one month the setting locked on +3 and although I could move the dial, it had no effect on the changing the actual setting the camera used which made it basically useless. It was repaired under warranty, but it took a month. Now after only 6 more months of use it failed again, this time it is locked and will no longer turn, and it has gone back to Nikon yet again. Disappointing for sure. Has anyone else had similar problems with the Df? I requested they create a menu setting to change the exposure compensation that overrides the dial but they have ignored me. <br /><br /></p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Don, the OP is asking if anyone else has an issue.....not launching a whining troll campaign against Nikon's poor quality control and Customer Service.</p>

<p>...well maybe the later, but you can see why! What would it take to just reply...'</p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>'Thanks for the idea, we'll pass it on to the engineers'</p>

 

</blockquote>

<p>One of the great strengths AND weaknesses of the internet is that it amplifies problems and draws attention to potentially rare events. I say<em> potentially</em> because how would anyone know if they were one of many thousands of disgruntled users, rather than a sole sufferer?</p>

<p>Nikon are hardly going to reply with,</p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>'Gosh. this is the 418th Df dial we've had to replace TWICE just this month alone'</p>

</blockquote>

<p>are they?? They have a pretty good record of 'Living in Denial Land' as it is!</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>As you all ready stated; "the quality is supper, and super on the low light condition too". I noticed this, using a D3s and a D4, all my images, specially low light and high ISO, I getting better quality of images then the previous ones. The "compensation dial, and the whole dial system, I don't liked from the first day, fortunately I'm an old guy and using the camera as I did in the film are, "M" only, learn how to compensate lighting with the light meter only, + (-) and almost never used the compensation dial. I agree, the design with the little lock button is a failure of Nikon in this camera. But, I using this camera, more and more, then the 2 other Nikons I have. As I noticed, unfortunately, Nikon services getting more and more lazy, unreliable, and careless. Probably they have to fire everybody and replaces them with staff from Japan, then the quality of service my improve. After so many failure, you have to demand a replacement from Nikon, regardless of the expired warranty time.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>With as complex as a DSLR is I am not at all surprised with the problems. I have had eight F mount DSLR's of the six made by Nikon four have had to go back for repairs. Two of them multiple times.My film era Nikons went back at regular intervals but for CLA's not for repairs. and if they needed minor repair work I could send them to a local repair shop.</p>

<p>So give the OP a break Nikon's track record is not all it could be on robustness of design with there DSLR's</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Yes it is quite likely that the exposure compensation dial gets bumped a lot, it is far more exposed than on any of their other models. This is likely exacerbated by the dial design which is a knurled aluminum so it can catch on things that the more standard rounded plastic dials do not. I shoot a lot in rain forest so it gets wet as well. I certainly do not think the dial is as robust as the versions on most Nikons where it is a small button then a control dial. Likely the weatherproofing is much better on these as I have never had an issue - I have used a D60, D300s, D7000, D800 in addition to the Df.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I think part of this is how heavily you use your cameras. For example, my experience with Nikon SLRs and DSLRs over more than 30 years is completely different from Michael Bradtke's, but most likely he uses his Nikon cameras far far more heavily than I do, thus we have drastically different experiences.</p>

<p>The Df is mainly for certain enthusiasts who prefer the retro style rather than pros who routinely abuse their camera equipment. If you tend to bump your cameras a lot, the metal exposure compensation dial that sticks out can potentially be an issue. I don't have a Df but I usually don't bump my cameras. Therefore, if I had a Df, I probably wouldn't run into this same issue.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I had the Df since Dec 26th 2013 and I have only used the exposure compensation dial once just to make sure that it works. I never actually use it as I never use the EC.<br>

I do understand many people nowaday consider the EC as the primary mean to control exposure. They may have the camera on P, Or on A if they need certain amount of DOF on S if they need a particular shutter speed. Even on M if they need to shoot at a certain combination of shutter speed and aperture still the mean to control exposure is the built in light meter and the EC dial. (of course when the camera is in M mode the ISO is in auto). If the meter does it well then fine if it doesn't do it to your liking there goes the EC dial. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I've got two DF's, between them over 100,000 shutter actuations. I use the exposure compensation dial all the time changing it pretty much on every exposure - not had any problems at all.<br /> At first the exposure compensations dial was the aspect of the camera that I was least sure about - specifically the fact that it had a lock on it and how easy it would be to operate. In practise, I've grown to really like it. Generally, I've found it to be just a brilliant camera. There are a few little niggles that annoy me (it's too easy to knock the diopter adjustment and also the the exposure mode switch), but I'm still in love with this camera.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>BTW, I'd describe my use of the cameras as fairly heavy - and they're not being treated with kid gloves. Typically they may make 2000 - 2500 exposures in a heavy days shoot, get covered in sweat, and I've had them on assignment on eg. sailing ships and small boats, quite a bit of foreign travel etc. At some point I expect one or the other to give up from the abuse (my previous D700's and D2x's needed several repairs), but so far so good.(touches wood).</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I don't think that the exposure compensation dial is a design flaw. I have had my DF for a year and have had no issues with this. My only issue with the DF is the back rubber thumb support (handle). It eventually stretches to the point where you have to glue corners back on. I have read elsewhere that this is a common problem with most Nikon cameras. I think that Nikon needs to address this in the future and use a better quality rubber and glue. My other cameras like the Sony A850 has never had this problem. Why should we have to consistently replace rubber parts on such an expensive camera?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>i had the shutter of my d3 renewed about 2 years ago.<br /> now, almost 300 000 images later, it still works.</p>

<p>sell the df, get a d3 :)</p>

<p>just kidding.<br /> when using any sort of equipment, you must expect that it will break.<br /> when that point comes, you usally do not know.<br /> things like this will happen again, and again, and again ...<br /> sometimes more often, sometimes less.<br /> the df is a good camera but you're supposed to take more care of it<br /> as maybe of a d3.<br /> be gentle!</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p>Nikon's response. Impact damage. $431 to replace exposure compensation dial.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Yikes. I don't know enough information to comment on this specific case, but it is fairly well known that Nikon repair has a tendency to use the "impact damage" excuse. However, in any case, $431 seems to be very high to repair something that is on the outside (so that it is unnecessary to take the entire camera apart). I wonder how much the labor cost is to change the exposure compensation dial on the Df.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Without wanting to have a word removed......but that is just bloody ridiculous.<br>

<br>

The fact that this will be your <strong><em>third</em></strong> dial is just utterly daft.<br>

<br>

The dial and the 'innards' will cost Nikon about $2. Exposure compensation dials have been on cameras since metering began and they are not rocket science.<br>

<br>

Without wanting to sound like a cracked record this is just Nikon at it again...and again. They make a camera to appeal to the 'retro' market who they deem to have deep pockets and then charge them an arm and both legs to replace something that costs pennies and is positioned on the camera body for them to claim 'Impact Damage'. <br>

<br>

They have made it so no-one else can fix it, 'cos they can't get the spares, and now you're stuffed with paying mega bucks. <br>

<br>

All I can suggest is finding a grown up to actually speak to and explain this will be your third dial and you didn't actually hit it....oh, and it's still under warranty.<br>

<br>

</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p>It's a complicated assembly with the ISO dial, lock buttons, bearings, weather seals, and underlying electrical structures.</p>

 

</blockquote>

<p>That they've been making since the '60's........ and still cost less than $5</p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>no reason to think that <strong>only</strong> the knob itself was damaged</p>

</blockquote>

<p>So Dan, are you subscribing to Nikon's 'Impact Damage' story?</p>

<p>Anyone know what Nikon's hourly rate is? </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>No Mike, I am subscribing to Scott's own statement that "Yes it is quite likely that the exposure compensation dial gets bumped a lot".</p>

<p>But yes, Nikon's repair rates are rather high. On the other hand, it' silly to think Nikon USA could service the camera for an amount equal to the variable cost of producing one more exposure compensation knob.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>i had the aperture mechanism exchanged in my d3 and it was about 530$.</p>

<p>so i guess i would pick up the phone and ask them if you could stop by and do it yourself and pay the 2 bucks for the dial ..</p>

<p>i am speechless</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...