24mm Lens choices

I'm considering a new 24mm lens. I'm thinking a 24mm f/2.8 ASPH used or maybe a 24mm/3.8 new or used (the slower one Leica just

put out). I have a Voigtlander 25 and an M9 and M8. I'm thinking that since weight is more important than aperture I might go for the

slower one though I might be more likely to have a profile for the older ASPH lens. Anyone have any advice?

<p>I'm new to Leica so take this advice for what it's worth . . . I researched this last year, trying to decide between the same lenses in addition to the Zeiss Biogon 25. There are comparisons and in depth reviews on other sites if you search a bit. My recollection from the reviews and user comments on L-Camera-Forum and other sites is that the Elmar 3.8 is incredibly sharp, has the highest degree of contrast, low distortion and is very compact; the Zeiss has very nice IQ but is a bit less sharp in the corners, is larger and heavier but a great value (under $1K used); and the Elmarit while very sharp and low distortion, has a bit less contrast than the Elmar. Many users seemed to like it best. Even though it costs more than the others, I went with the Elmarit 24/2.8 ASPH. I found a nice used one with 6 bit coding and have been happy with it but it seems like it is hard to go wrong with any of them. </p>

<p>I am going through the same thing right now, looking at the 25mm Zeiss. A pro friend who has owned dozens of Leica lenses swears it's one of the sharpest he's ever used. </p>

<p>The ZM 25 Biogon is stunning and great value. It isn't small. The VC is tiny, but mine flares a bit too easily. Have a look at the long running ZM 25 Biogon pictures thread on rangefinderforum.com. Some great pictures there. Have a look at the gorgeous Swedish summer scene in the third picture down.<br /> http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124134</p>

With the incredible lowlight performance of the new sensors, (apart from DOF) lens speed is no longer a big advantage.

 

 

Add to that, (even with its bargain price) the issues of long term quality in the Zeiss Biogon, and the natural pick becomes the compact,

super performing Leica Elmar 24mm/3.8...

<p>I've shot with the Leica 24mm f2.8 Asph, the 25mm f2.8 Zeiss Biogon, and the 25mm f4 VC Skopar. I finally sold the Leica because I loved the Zeiss' performance and handling, and the Leica stayed home all the time. <br>

The VC is a very nice little lens, but I find it vignettes somewhat at f4. Even so, I really enjoy shooting with it because it is so small and compact. I have the M mount version with the focusing tab and it's a joy to handle. </p>

<p>24/2.8 is fabulous. See.</p><div></div>

<p>The V/C 25/4 is made for the M8. Keep it. The Biogon 25/2.8 is a swell lens. The Leica 24/3.8 is very good but a little redundant, as you have a 25/4. If you can afford it, get the Leica 24/2.8 Asph. I had a chance years ago to get one at a good price and passed it up. Still kicking myself.</p>