Jump to content

Deardorff 8x10 - Backpack?


stephen_mcateer

Recommended Posts

<p>Back in the seventies, I put one in a Kelty D series pack and frame that had no internal compartments. The one big area held the camera, lenses, holders, cloth and meter. The side pockets held snacks, and I laid my tripod cross-wise along the top as if it were a long, skinny tent. I also put a sweater in to keep everything from moving around.<br>

<br />Best of luck, this is a wonderful thing to do!!</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Over the years I have carried my Toyo 8x10 field camera in a variety of large backpacks, but about 5 years ago purchased a Kelty redwing from photobackpacker.com and could not have been happier. The fit, protection, and comfort of that pack is the best ever. If I needed another I would order it tomorrow.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I just purchased a pack with camera and lens inserts, plus two "Cascade" film holder systems, from Photobackpacker - and this is so well suspended/balanced, and so well thought out in general in terms of photography (large format in my case) workflow/logistics, that I think it may add an additional five (or more) years to my approaching "old age time window" for schlepping my gear into the wilds. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>My pack is the Redwing P2. In it I carry my metal field camera and large focus cloth in the bottom compartment, and two large lenses in the top compartment. I could fit 3 lenses if they were a bit smaller. In the back compartment I can carry 4 film holders, and in a side compartment I have my compendium bellows, focus loupe, etc. With that amount of gear and a sturdy tripod I am good to go most anywhere my 70 old legs will take me, and they have taken me to a lot of beautiful remote places.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I have a Kelty Redwing that I like for my Deardorff. But my old Gregory large backpack turned out to be better with its design for heavy loads. It feels much sturdier on my back, the waist belt is more comfortable, and walking is easier. It also has more inside room for another lens or two and film holders, but it does weigh a lot when loaded. </p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I have carried a Kodak 2-D with a lens and a few holders in an older model LowePro Trekker. Worked well enough for me.<br>

PhotoBackpacker has a line of semi-rigid protective boxes designed for Large Format equipment; lens and cameras and holders. They carry the Kelty backpacks to hold it all too. </p>

<p>Check out http://www.photobackpacker.com/home.php</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...