keith reeder Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 <blockquote> <p>I think I will be happy with the 5MP D3/D700 after all!</p> </blockquote> <p>That's only 400 ISO, Avi - and speaking personally I don't find that image very impressive.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avishek_aiyar Posted February 21, 2013 Author Share Posted February 21, 2013 <p>Jamie: wow...never knew about that one.....specs look very promising. This effectively rules out the D400.<br> The only thing I need to wait for is reviews on the AF and how good it would be for BIF and wildlife tracking like scenarios....looks like the reviews on the D7000 are a bit mixed, with some people loving it and some people not so much.<br> Also of course the high ISO performance. <br> Keith: I am quite happy with that image, but I just realized that a lot of my current prints are DX crops (as in crops of my 12 MP original D300 image)....so I will effectively be "double cropping" when shooting with the D3....now that can be a big problem. <br> Loads to think about......</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avishek_aiyar Posted February 21, 2013 Author Share Posted February 21, 2013 <p>wow....just checking the specs.....it might just be the camera!<br /> AF support upto F8, 51 AF points, a 1.3x crop mode for even more reach and that too at ~16 MP (thats almost like a built-in high quality TC)....wow.....and all this at $1200.... I can't see any reason not to get the camera. <br /> Just when I was losing faith in Nikon, they release this.....what a coincidence. <br /> Am still going to wait for user reviews to avoid any surprises.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith reeder Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 <p>It's got the makings of a hell of a camera, Avi.</p> <p>Assuming the sensor is better than the equivalent(ish) sensor being used in the Sony bodies (which by all accounts isn't <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/11/08/sony-a850-a900-canon-5d-mark-ii-iso-comparisons/">that good</a> at high ISO compared to, say, the 16mp sensor in the D7000/Pentax K-5/Sony A77 - interesting how well the 7D holds up in that test though!) and you're OK with the smaller form factor compared to the D300, you should be fine. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crowe Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 <p>That is funny, overnight you may have your answer in the D7100!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keith reeder Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 <blockquote> <p>Assuming the sensor is better than the equivalent(ish) sensor being used in the Sony bodies</p> </blockquote> <p>I should add that I'm sure it will be!</p> <p>The small form factor would be an issue for me though - the D300 is a much nicer camera to handle than the D7000 in my experience.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avishek_aiyar Posted February 22, 2013 Author Share Posted February 22, 2013 Keith: same worry at my end. I am going to wait till the middle of the year to see if there are more introductions....I doubt it, but still. Avi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelum_jayasuriya Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 <p>Hi all,<br> I am Kelum & new to the forum. I would like to buy 1D mark IV camera body.<br> From where I can buy this body around 1,500 ~2,000$.<br> thanks<br> Kelum</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_koffend Posted November 12, 2013 Share Posted November 12, 2013 <p>Okay, FWIW, I am not a professional by any imagination. In fact, probably by most people's standards I am a novice hobbyist.<br> I would love the get the 1D4, but like you, I have a tough time justifying the price difference.<br> I have the 1D3 literally for wildlife and as a camera body that I can take more risks with (by that I mean, I have a white water trip in Costa Rica coming up and am planning on taking the 1D3 body in the raft, I wouldn't even consider taking my 5D3 in the raft!). <br> I am not ever going to publish any of my shots. Maybe a few prints to hang on my wall, More likely, I would make some "greeting cards" and use them for stationary (I still like to write an old fashioned letter every now and then).<br> My default ISO speed when shooting birds is 800. When lighting conditions permit, I'll drop it to 400. To me, I'd like the flexibility of a slightly higher ISO to make sure I can get the shot with the shutter speed I need/want and an f/8 for DOF. Sure, I'll drop down to ISO 100-200 for stationary subjects with slower shutter speed at f/4-5.6. But I hate being caught in a position and miss a BIF shot cause I am stuck on too low an ISO!<br> The 1D3 is fine at 400-800 and can be pushed to 1600 if you are willing to sit longer at your computer!<br> The 1D4 is better, yes. But for 3 times as much money. For me, I'll take the 1D3 now and in a few years upgrade to the 1D4, at $1,000 when my 1D3 is worth about $500. That's generally how I like to climb the body ladder - as a hobbyist.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now