friedemann_pistorius Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 <p>I have two Lee ND Grad filter sets (hard and soft edge, 03/06/09 each). After a year of flawless work they're loosing density, i.e. the 09 filter for example is only 06, or in other words I have to combine 09 and 03 to come close to 09 densitiy. The loss of density is different from filter to filter, but ALL filters show this effect. I store 3 filters in a Lee filter wrap (1 filter per compartment) and each wrap in a Lee pouch, so I think I stored them properly. They're exposed to light only for a few minutes while composing and shooting.<br /> Interestingly, I had the same effect with an identical LEE filter set about two years ago (which were replaced by Lee). Now these replacement filters show the same loss of density.</p><p>I contacted Lee again and they told me that the filters do lose some color over time, but surely not with filters one or two years old. Although they will re-dye or replace the filters again, I don’t want to repeat this procedure every two years or so.</p><p>From your experience, have you experienced a similar behaviour with ND grad filters from other manufacturers (Singh Ray, HiTech, Tiffen, others...)?<br /> Any input will be greatly appreciated.</p><p>Thank you,<br /> Friedemann</p><p><em>PS. I wasn't sure which was the right forum for this question, so I've posted it in two other forums too.</em></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
q.g._de_bakker Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 Friedemann,<br>I noticed something similar with Sinar filters (i don't know who made them - could have been Lee). They came in a paper envelope inside a plastic sleeve, with a window cut in the paper to show what filter it is. I have seen quite a few Sinar filters that have that window 'imprinted' on them by selective fading. Not just ND grads, but also colour grads and colour filters.<br><br>I'm not sure what caused that, do also suspect some outgassing from the sleeve or other interaction with the material the filters are stored in.<br><br>Perhaps it would be better if we would indeed consider filters 'consumables', and expect to replace them every now and again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_henderson Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 <p>I have a set of Hitechs that are a few years old and coming to the end of their useful lives. I just tested these and found that they were pretty much spot on- well not enough out to give me a reading half a stop more or less than they should be. They're stored in a Lee pouch- so similar to you. It may be significant here in that both Lee and HiTech were set up in similar timeframes by people who came out of a division of Kodak, and they've often shared problems over the years- for example different dye batches creating colour casts and so on.</p> <p>I presume you measured yours when you got them ( as I do) Its not unknown for new filters to be a little out too, though I've had much more of an issue with colour casts than I have with inaccurate ND factors.</p> <p>I treat ND filters as consumables as QG suggests. The main reason for that is scratching which I may be able to avoid if I treated them better, but I don't pretend that a filter is definitively in its pouch or on the camera or that I don't leave a filter on the camera in my bag occasionally. So I guess what I'm saying is that if Hitech promised to replace my filters free every couple of years, that would save me a lot. I certainly would not be looking to change brands to avoid the problem.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friedemann_pistorius Posted April 7, 2013 Author Share Posted April 7, 2013 <p>Q.G. and David, thank you for your answers.<br /> Yes, I measured every filter when I got them and they were all spot on. I measured them a few weeks ago and the 09 grads lost about 1 stop, the 06 grads lost about 1/2, roughly.<br /> Considering the filters as consumables is fine with me, as long as the manufacturer agrees with this procedure. Otherwise, replacing grad filters every 2 years (as I have experienced it so far) at my own expense will be a bit too costly for me...<br /> I'm just curious if ND grads from other manufacturers doen't show this loss of color/density.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbright Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 <p>Friedmann,<br> Thanks for posting this most interesting issue, as it had to be brought to my attention this way, and I have just done my own tests with my, .06, and .09 Lee hard grads. Interestingly enough because of my intermittent method of shooting, my Lee hard grads are about 7 years old and they have lost equally 1 stop each. I'm getting 2 stops for the .09, that should be 3 stops, and 1 stop for the .06, that should be 2 stops. You have referred to a time frame of loss, at about 2 years, and mine is at about 7 years. Could it be that the loss goes to a certain point, then discontinues? Not that makes any difference, the loss is a loss, but its interesting that in my case, 7 year old filters only lost 1 stop. My filters are kept in the dark in the provided pouch, and I have cleaned them from time to time. Exposure to light is the obvious culprit, I wonder if cleaning them contributes to the loss also.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donbright Posted April 7, 2013 Share Posted April 7, 2013 <p>Friedemann, Sorry, I wanted to get the spelling of your name correct.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now