Redid my website from scratch

<p>started all over again and wanted it as clean as simple so the emphasis goes to where it belongs, the actual photography. It's still mobile ready.</p>

<p>Your input would be appreciated. Thanks.</p>

<p>URL?</p>

<p>If you click on his name, you find the URL.</p>

<p>I don't remember how the old was organized, but this has a nice clean design, as you intended.</p>

I like it and the clean design a lot, Ton. Can't think of anything I'd change. Once in a while the picture-to-picture navigation controls seemed to move around a bit. But couldn't get it to replicate that behavior

consistently.

 

Overall, looks great!

<p>Also, I like the photos a lot, but I think you already knew that.</p>

It looks great, Ton! And for what it's worth I just toured it using an iPad - navigation, resolution, everything behaved just

so.

 

And the photography is, as always, so much compelling fun to view.

<p>Geoff, sorry about that. Rookie error which Jeff luckily corrected for.</p>

<p>Jeff, thanks and yes, I already knew that. Wasn't fishing though. Well actually I was but more about the lay-out. Wasn't sure about that white background to be honest. Also the number of photos was a bit of a dilemma because I don't like websites with too many potos. Still not sure.</p>

<p>Thanks Brad, yes it does that. I e-mailed them about that but they told me they are not going to change that soon. I could do that myself but I'm not that HTML savvy. A friend of me is though, perhaps he can correct for that. BTW, I'm going to shoot some more photos on the track this year and publish the results. I've talked to a few people and all say it's worth to be published but they find the risk too great, no surprise really. Nowadays even with wellknown photographers, which I'm not, they tend to float a proof on the internet to get an indication to see if it's commercially worth their while. You can hardly fault them for that. Until a few years ago we had subsidies to get this kind of work published. Another well dried up so it will probably be self-publishing in the end. Seeing your results that's also a nice way to do things.</p>

<p>Thanks Matt, yes the mobile version seems to work fine. I actually set out to not using flash. Much more practical this way.</p>

The photos are wonderful, first of all. Bravo! The design is uncluttered, tasteful, and straightforward.

 

When viewed from an iPad, the top and bottom of the vertical photos are clipped. I couldn't figure out how to resize them

to see the full photo.

 

I like how the copyright is added against a darker area.