Jump to content

Nice book on Camera History


JDMvW

Recommended Posts

<p>Just the other day I was at my local Barnes and Noble bookstore, and found some copies of</p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>Gustavson, Todd<br>

2011 <strong><em>500 Cameras: 150 Years of Photographic Innovation</em></strong>. New York: Fall River Press.<br>

[from George Eastman House]</p>

</blockquote>

<p>For sale in the discounted books section.<br>

It's a lovely book, as good in its own way as Gustavson's other recent historical work <em>Camera</em>, which has been mentioned previously on Photo.net<br>

And it's for sale at remainder prices, for whatever reason.</p>

<p>It's listed on the B&N website, but at a slightly higher price, I think, than I paid in store. Also at other on-line vendors, again, for a slightly higher price.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Not that Gustavson is without flaw. In this book (500 Cameras) he has contradictions on who invented the instant return mirrors and very little mention of any DDR contributions. Also Canon is pretty much out of the running. It seems that Nikon, as some of you already 'knew', was the only innovator (in conjunction with Kodak, of course) in recent years. ;)</p>

<p>It's still a great book overall, and will provide plenty of camera p o r n for all of you while the weather slows down postings here on CMC</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>It's a fun book, and yes, not without errors. His earlier book, "Camera" has some of the same material, and at that time, I noted several errors, but never e-mailed him about them. This time, I did (he wrote that the Argus A did not originally take standard 35mm cassettes, among other things) and he promptly responded and thanked me for pointing that out. I think he may have been confused with the Univex Mercury. However, it's a book filled with camera porn, and some neat stories. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ooh...yup, I got the book! I had to have it as soon as I saw it! :)

 

As far as any "inaccuracies" are concerned, I don't know nearly enough about photographic history to be able to catch them. But I never intended to have it for historical research. I mainly just wanted it as a reference...and maybe a wish list for what cameras to collect! I look through it sometimes and if there is anything that looks like it would be really cool to have, I start hunting for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...