Jump to content

Canon IIF2 - Rare and Fine in the Blur of Time


Recommended Posts

<p>The finders even on this last generation of Canon bottom-loaders are still pretty "squinty". I got a IV-SB2 to "improve" on my II-F, and it was a rather small improvement in the finder. A Canon P, 7, or 7s is a totally different experience, which is more like a Leica M. (But none of the Canon rangefinders have the "sharp edged" moving image of a Leica M, that's unique to that much more complicated rangefinder.) That's why my primary rangefinder camera is my Canon 7s.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>As for construction quality, both my II-F and IV-SB2 are quite beautiful inside. I think the parts quality and precision are higher than my Leica IIIa. Leica had a lot of "select at test" parts, and may have had to adjust (file) parts at test. Canon looks to have taken Deming's approach to heart, everything looks so precise inside, I suspect that there was a lot less fiddling to get the cameras working.<br>

Painful side is that it's harder to change the shutter curtains on the Canon, since they have to be absolutely precisely located on a jig that isn't available anymore. On the Leica IIIc and later, there's adjustment points for the 1/500 and 1/1000 shutter speeds that make assembly of the shutter curtains far less critical.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Wow, Louis. Those are really very nice pictures, especially the portrait. The camera is a beauty as well but what you consistently do with them amazes me. I think I've gotten more inspiration from your photos and Rick Drawbridge's than any books or magazines I've looked at anytime recently. Thanks very much for another outstanding post.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...