andrew_c2 Posted October 25, 2011 Share Posted October 25, 2011 <p>In 2005 or so, I bought an HP 8450 because I wanted convenience in making decent black and white prints just for my home. At the time, the Epson 1850 and other Epsons appeared to be more tweakable with possibly better output, but with a lot more work. I'm lazy. I didn't feel like messing around with clogged printer heads, different profiles and such.<br /> I have to admit that it's been some time since I used it, but I have a feeling I'll be churning out b&w prints again soon.<br /> So, I'm wondering, what's an easy, little-fuss printer that you can put out nice b&w prints using these new-fangled papers that weren't available in 2005-- Ilford Galerie Gold Silk, Harmon Gloss, etc.; that can come closest to a fibre print? All I'm currently set up for is Lightroom 3 (I don't even bother with Photoshop on my newest computer), possibly also purchasing something like Alien Skin Exposure to get different b&w profiles... and a calibrated monitor.<br /> Or, is sticking with the 8450 and just getting into these newer papers the way to go? Which papers would you then suggest?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_elenko Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 <p>My advice, based on six years of owning similar HP printers (as well as their ill-fated, but artistically superb pigment-based B9180), and a couple of 13x19 pigment-based Epsons, is to keep what you have and enjoy it.</p> <p>Those dye-based printers that HP made in the mid-2000s that had a photo-grey cart were the peak of HPs pro-sumer printing technology. It is still the best moderate budget B&W output on glossy paper that I've seen. I've printed exhibition prints on newer baryta papers with pigment inks, but there are still some residual artifacts visible.</p> <p>If you stay with HP Premium Plus paper, then your dye-based images will be last for many decades according to Wilhelm. I like the soft gloss in particular. Ilford still markets a very similar "classic" paper that works 98% as good.</p> <p>I don't know how much longer HP will be making those no. 100 grey ink carts as only a few printers, all now in their digital late middle ages, require them. So enjoy them while you can. And yes, HP carts are outrageously expensive. But I've never had a clog.</p> <p>If you want to spend near a thousand bucks then the new Epson 3000 I'm sure will produce a killer pigment B&W. But having so many papers to choose from complicates matters as much as it provides artistic benefits, because one tends to have a fair amount of trial and error. You use the word "easy," and what you got is the easiest solution I can think of.</p> <p>ME</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartMoxham Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 <p>I bought a HP printer in 2006 especially for the no. 100 grey cartridges. Problem for me now is nowhere local sells the cartridges anymore. If you can get the cartridges easily and you like the output then stick with them.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew_c2 Posted October 26, 2011 Author Share Posted October 26, 2011 <p>I see the HP 100 grey cartridges on eBay still. I did like the output and I have some prints from that time that still look nice. </p> <p>I guess I'm also an optimizer, on top of being lazy! (not the greatest combo) I guess my question was also, can I get a lot better for maybe a minimum little more work? But I've read from the responses that the HP dye-based printers are still pretty good.<br> Maybe I'll look for an 8750 somewhere, to expand the print size.</p> <p>Thanks,<br />André </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_bergman1 Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 <p>HP still sells the HP 100 Grey cartridges for the 8450. Better yet is to buy the HP 102 Grey cartridges. These are generally listed under the 8750 printer. They have 23 ml of ink versus 15 ml for the HP 100.</p> <p>As to new printers, I don't see HP offering any printer of interest. Epson does have the 2880. It has great output and offers many paper options. The only problem I have is that I now live in a very dry climate. I don't know if this will cause ink clogging.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_elenko Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 <p>After getting frustrated by the abysmally engineered HP B9180, I purchased a used 8750 on ebay for $50. It even had two of the carts. The difference in models is that the 8750 has an additional photo blue cart that brings even more intensity to color output. And it outputs up to 13x19 inch prints.<br> A real bargain to me.</p> <p>ME</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed_nsb Posted October 26, 2011 Share Posted October 26, 2011 <p>Honestly I said I would never buy another Epson printer due to 4 of them in a row stopped printing around 1 year of usage. I feel Epson is ripping off its clients so I moved to HP. I've never had a single head or cartridge issue with HP but I too feel they are moving away from the photo type of printers. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted October 29, 2011 Share Posted October 29, 2011 <p>Yes, HP have pulled out of semi-pro level printers leaving only their office stuff and the large format bureau printers. A shame. I have had both Epson and HP and they all never seem to last. If you have 5-6 years out of them then that's what you have to expect. I've given up on home printing and use a good printing service now myself. My wallet and blood pressure are better as a result.</p> Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted October 30, 2011 Share Posted October 30, 2011 <blockquote> <p> I've given up on home printing and use a good printing service now myself.</p> </blockquote> <p>I am with Robin on this. I find the quality of mpix, WHCC, and even Costco (at least the one closest to me) are on par with home printing and far less headache. It can also be cheaper than home printing, especially if you have problem prints. You don't pay for problems with the others. Some Costcos use Epson high end printers too.</p> Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
don_essedi Posted October 31, 2011 Share Posted October 31, 2011 <p>And I'm with Jeff on this. Most of my prints are made by Mpix. This works well if you are okay with the paper choices offered by Mpix and similar services.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now