January 31 Panasonic/Olympus POTW

<p>E5 / 50-200<br>

iso 1600<br>

Standard in camera NR</p>

<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patrickporter/5414494478/"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4131/5414494478_2f4bf9c778_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>

<p>Deleted the other pic. This is an E5 ISO 200 shot. I recently learned that ISO 100 is actually an expansion setting and 200 is the real base. 200 apparently has far better dynamic range and ability to deal with highlights, so I tested and found it to be quite a valid claim :) Good to know.<br>

<a title="ISO 200 DR Test by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4080/5415772245_e565c982b2_z.jpg" alt="ISO 200 DR Test" width="474" height="640" /></a></p>

<p>Nobody is posting, so I'll post more :D<br>

Example of 12-60mm blur-ability at 12mm wide open (I don't like the word bokeh :P )</p>

<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5094/5419275872_228dc88c2d_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>

<p>12-60mm lens at f/7.1<br>

These are all on the E-5 btw</p>

<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/patrickporter/5419352082/"><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/5419352082_5c0eae59b5_z.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="640" /></a></p>

<p>Difficult lighting situations:</p>

<p><a title="Untitled by Patrick E Porter, on Flickr" href=" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5300/5419433468_78d25e43f9_z.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>