nglester Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 <p>Hello guys<br> I thought the older Leica screw mount series can't use any of the M Bayonet lenses. I just tried out a friend's Voigtlander f2 50mm M mount and it screwed onto my iiif without a problem.<br> We just did a few snap shots on a fresh roll and wondering how it the pictures will come up.<br> Am i being mis-guided to get the screw mounts?<br> Please advice. Thank you</p> <p>Thanks in advance</p> <p><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/_Y2wcituU2bc/TTSKmFOIOUI/AAAAAAAAAJ0/-2tOGXkmk_c/s576/photo%201.JPG" alt="" width="430" height="576" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 <p>M mount lenses don't screw into anything...they bayonet in. You were probably using one which was a screw mount version fitted to a LTM screw->M mount adapter with the adapter removed. I do the same thing with my VC 15/f4.5 Super-wide Heliar ASPH depending on which camera I use it with: plain for LTM, attach the adapter for the M bodies..</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soeren_engelbrecht1 Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 <p>That's because that particular Voigtlaender lens is actually not M Mount, but Leica Screw (or "LTM"). To make it work on an M, you need a screw-on adapter that "adds the bayonet". Today, Voigtlaender primarily makes M-mount lenses, where you cannot unscrew the bayonet, so to speak.<br /><br /><br />Soeren</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian_stuart Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 <p>Hi Lester<br> The M-bayonet lens mount-to-film distance is 27.8mm, whereas the screw mount-to-film distance is 28.8mm. It is impossible to fit a M-bayonet lens to a screw mount camera and keep the lens in focus registry. I suspect that your friend's lens is a screwmount lens fitted with M-bayonet adapter. Remove the adapter and you have a normal screwmount lens.<br> By the way, the lens in your picture is a Nokton, which is a F/1.5 lens. This lens was made in screwmount (maybe only screwmount) according to Cameraquest.com.<br> Cheers</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nglester Posted January 17, 2011 Author Share Posted January 17, 2011 <p>oh ok, i got it.<br> Yes, he's got a M adapter on the M6 body. It's a bloody nice lens, thinking to get one myself too.<br> Thanks guys!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mukul_dube Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 <p>Lens has to be a 50/1.5 Nokton, which was made only in screw mount. There never was a Cosina-Voigtlander 50/2 in screw mount.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_a._shapiro Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 <p>@MD<br> Wrong.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mukul_dube Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 <p>Michael A. Shapiro: "@MD Wrong."</p> <p>Educate me, please.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nglester Posted January 19, 2011 Author Share Posted January 19, 2011 <p>Mukul, i think Michael is right.<br> I saw this "near brand new" Ultron 35mm/ 1,7 yesterday, just couldn't help it and took the little orphan home with me.</p> <p><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_Y2wcituU2bc/TTbq_3ds14I/AAAAAAAAAKE/1bAJZNvNprw/s640/iiif%2Bultron%2BViOOH%204.JPG" alt="" width="478" height="640" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mukul_dube Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 <p>"There never was a Cosina-Voigtlander 50/2 in screw mount."</p> <p>This is what I wrote. I stand by it. An Ultron 35/1.7 is <strong>not</strong> a 50/2. Or am I wrong there too? Why don't you people <strong>read</strong> before you let it out? Where is Michael A. Shapiro anyway?</p> <p>I have an Ultron 35/1.7: and it is hardly "little". Look at a Summaron 35/3.5 if you want to see what I mean.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Smith Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 <p>Lester's lens looks like the 50 1.5 Nokton to me. Great lens!</p> Robin Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_cooke Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 <blockquote> <p><em>"There never was a Cosina-Voigtlander 50/2 in screw mount."</em><br> <em>This is what I wrote. I stand by it. An Ultron 35/1.7 is <strong>not</strong> a 50/2. Or am I wrong there too? Why don't you people <strong>read</strong> before you let it out? Where is Michael A. Shapiro anyway?</em></p> </blockquote> <blockquote>You are wrong there is a 50mm f2.0 in screw mount and it is still currently available.</blockquote> <blockquote>http://www.cameraquest.com/voigt_502n.htm</blockquote> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mukul_dube Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 <p>I stand corrected. My information was from before 2009, when the only 50/2 in the line was the Heliar Classic in M mount.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nglester Posted January 19, 2011 Author Share Posted January 19, 2011 Yea Robin, the lenses are amazing. The silver one is the 35mm 1.7 ultron. The 50mm 1.5 is the black one. Both amazing lenses, just did a test roll. Mukul. I just thought you said the 50/2 is the only that I can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mukul_dube Posted January 19, 2011 Share Posted January 19, 2011 <p>Lester, please read what I wrote. With the out-dated information I had, I thought that there was no C-V 50/2 in screw mount. I was wrong, as we see from the link that James Cooke gave. We see, though, that before the 2009 nickel "limited edition" Heliar there was no 50/2 in screw mount. For some while I had a Heliar Classic 50/2 (M mount); and I nearly bought a 50/1.5 Nokton before settling for an M-Hexanon 50/2. My wide-angle is an Ultron 35/1.7. Just to show that up to a point in the past I was not so ignorant.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now