Jump to content

Chicago Nanny turns out to have been an extraordinary street photographer as well


Recommended Posts

<p>She's been mentioned here before. The original finder of the pictures seems to be well over his head with them, and in realizing what he has in some ways overestimating the value of the collection. That collection deserves to be in a major Chicago museum, the material professionally catalogued, curated and archivally stored.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p>Very nice. The shot of the guy sitting on a park bench with a balloon in front of his face is priceless.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>You beat me to it Craig. How many times have I passed or tossed a photo like that thinking, "That doesn't work."? The things you learn just by looking.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Thanks for posting, Ellis. I'd seen her work before too, I think from a post here at P'net, but no complaints on seeing it twice. I think there are many talented photogs who aren't trying to be discovered in their lifetimes, so they aren't. They die off, and a tiny percentage of these people are discovered posthumously by somebody ending up with their images.</p>

<p>Examples: the photo studio portraits of LaPorte IN, the anonymous city photographer in NYC, Michael Farmer down in the South.... I bet there are many, many, many more.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>

<p><em>Why?</em></p>

</blockquote>

<ul>

<li>Because it is truly great photography<em>, a</em>s good as any of the "street photography" school done since Atget.</li>

<li>The best of her work has an intelligence, and a very personal wit; a sense of beauty, clarity of vision, balance, and finally a photogrpahic poetry to it.</li>

<li>From what little I've seen so far Miss Maier did not flinch at jesting at and creating comedy at the expense of some people's vanity and also at expressing a tenderness that refuses to descend into mawkishness in her careful observations of people's straitened circumstances. </li>

<li>It is a unique body of work.</li>

</ul>

<p>That's why.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>And Arbus, and, and… Chicago will be great for excellent photo shows this Spring. I hope some really knowledgeable people are curating her work. <br>

And all that unexposed film! What would you do with it? I would auction each undeveloped roll. That alone would raise millions. Or even better, they should be exhibited up the street at the Museum of Contemporary Art. I'd curate that as "Vivian Maier, An Un-processed Life."<br>

AZ</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I never get tired of looking at those. I was completely blown away the first time I saw her work, she had such an eye for detail and such a personal way of looking at her subjects. While most 'street' photography conveys motion, is 'busy', never stops... she stopped thousands of moments in time, to show us (or perhaps just herself?) the inadvertently beautiful. She must have had an invisible cloak.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Count me as blown-away, too! I find it interesting (and heartening) that apparently her decades-old B&W film is being successfully developed... Any thoughts on that? Also, her choice of camera... In the tv clip, it sounds as if she may have strongly favored the Rolleiflex, and the pictures seem to look <em>technically</em> great, too, in terms of sharpness, resolution, etc. Any thoughts on her choice of camera? I'm not one to fixate on equipment, but am thinking of moving into medium format when finances allow, and know next to nothing about Rollei. Would this be your choice, too?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...