bruce_erickson1 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>Have any of you heard the assertion: "The amount of use a lens gets is inversely proportional to the distance its focal length is from the normal lens focal length of the camera." (Assuming ownership of more than one lens, of course.) I don't recall where I got that quote, but it seems appropriate. Now I often deliberately leave my 50mm at home so I'll use the other lenses more. How about you? </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobcossar Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>How about me? Well, I take my meds as directed and never have to worry about such issues anymore.....Robert</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemikel1 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>I must say that assertion is completly wrong in my case. I use my 10-20mm and 500mm, 99% of the time....My 50mm (or 18-55, or 55-200) are almost useless. Only my 105mm macro has some use....</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bojepsen1 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>That assertion is also not completely true in my case. My 50mm is, and has always been, collecting more dust than any other lens I own/have owned.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
railphotog Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>Me too, my original Canon 50mm and 28mm sit on the shelf all the time, no room in my camera bag and several zooms (from 11 to 300mm) cover the same range anyway.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_momary Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>Well, as a strict amateur ... a lot of times folks go for fisheye lenses and then get tired of that look, quickly. So that may be one point of validation.</p> <p>Jim</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wogears Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>Well, since my Nikon 50mm f1.4 is the 'equivalent' of a 75mm on my DX bodies, it gets a lot of use as a portrait lens. I keep the 105 f2.5 on my film body, and I use the 105 f4 macro a lot on both 'full-frame' and 'APS-C'.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geoffs1 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 <p>I'm probably atypical, but I'd guess that I rarely shoot with a "normal FOV" focal-length. The vast majority of my shots are taken at 200mm-400mm (on a 1.6 crop camera). On the other end, I'm finding I like the wide-angle perspective quite a lot.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipward Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I bought a fast 50mm two years ago as a backup for my zooms.Its never been on a body yet.I mostly shoot Street at 18mm to about 24mm on a crop body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Currie Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 <p>I find I use the 50 (for film) most often. But I don't think that there is a linear relation beyond that. When the 50 isn't right, I'm more likely to jump to lengths like 24 or 200 that can't be "zoomed by foot." </p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machts gut Posted October 29, 2010 Share Posted October 29, 2010 <p>The assertion is right for me. 50mm mostly, followed by 35mm. Both on film.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_taylor5 Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 <p>Most of the time I keep a 100mm portrait lens on one of my cameras and a 200mm lens on the other one. Yes I do tote two cameras.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now