lovella_lagdaan Posted October 31, 2010 Author Share Posted October 31, 2010 <p>Ok here are the results.</p> <p>I have attached a picture taken with AV f.2 as requested. exposture 1/250 and ISO-1600<br> The light was really good. I was told by the Dad taking pics that the lighting at our particular gym is one of the worst. Last meet was way better light.</p> <p>I am attaching a picture from each event</p> <p>Floor 1/200<br> Vault 1/320<br> Bars 1/320<br> Beam 1/250<br> I think the lens worked really well and is completely fine rather than getting the 70-200mm What do you think? I obviously need to mess around more with settings. But I do know that if this is the worst light and I can go even higher on my shutter speed my pictures probably will be even better?</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovella_lagdaan Posted October 31, 2010 Author Share Posted October 31, 2010 <p>Ok sorry but I couldn't attach so instead here is a link.<br> The one with no one in the pic is my AV shot<br> The rest were in TV with the shutter speeds I listed ISO01600<br> http://picasaweb.google.com/lovellal/PhotoAdvice?authkey=Gv1sRgCJTNt83_p9X8twE#</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 <p>Well, it is very late here but I have had a cursory glance at the five photos and they are all crisp for what I can see.</p> <p>A little colour correction and enlargement and they are will be great, IMO!</p> <p>I will have a closer look tomorrow, but I think you should be pretty happy with your efforts.</p> <p>WW</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 <p>A quick Colour Correction and Sharpen and Crop . . . I'd be pretty happy with this from a 100mm wide open at F/2, 1/320s at ISO1600 on a Rebel:</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Michael Posted October 31, 2010 Share Posted October 31, 2010 <blockquote> <p>"But I do know that if this is the worst light and I can go even higher on my shutter speed my pictures probably will be even better?"</p> </blockquote> <p>Yes. The girl upside down has her head and hands blurred a bit - 1/500s would be nicer for that image.</p> <p>WW</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovella_lagdaan Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 <p>Thanks WW.</p> <p>Do you think that the 70-200 would have put out a WAY better shot that the money is worth it? I'm thinking not.<br> Thanks again too for all the advice.<br> My decision right now is the 100mm and the 50mm</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now