mark_ng Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 <p>hey guys<br> What are the differences between the different models of A12 backs through the years? I know the newer models have the slide holder, but are there any other differences? It appears compatibility is certainly not an issue. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 <p><a href="http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?Hasselblad500el.html~mainFrame">http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?Hasselblad500el.html~mainFrame</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.apug.org/forums/forum51/53083-hasselblad-film-backs-c12-vs-a12.html">http://www.apug.org/forums/forum51/53083-hasselblad-film-backs-c12-vs-a12.html</a></p> ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
photo5 Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 <p>I have a few A12 backs, two of which I use regularly and have replaced the light seal. The third one has screws which I can't remove so it will have to go out for service. Both of the backs I use regularly have non-matching inserts and frame spacing is fine in both backs. I haven't used a brand new back so as to compare film flatness. Newer mint condition backs cost too much money, used A12 backs are around $75 or less which isn't so bad. Seems like now is the time to enjoy these cameras that used to be way out of my price range just a decade or 15 years ago.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob F. Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 <p>I have purchased all my A12 backs used. The differences seem small. My older ones have spool retaining arms that are separately hinged. I find that convenient. My newer ones have a sort of see-saw arrangement where neither end is hinged. It's all one piece, and you just lift one end at a time. It doesn't make much sense to me to have it that way, as it seems trickier; but it doesn't really make much difference either. For the backs I own, that's the only difference that stands out in my mind.</p> <p>I have bought a couple of under-$100 used backs. So far I have had to send two backs to David Odess to cure spacing problems. At least one of those was in the under-$100 category. I think it makes sense to try to buy backs in known good condition, even if they cost $175 instead of $75.00.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ng Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 <p>Thanks the for input. I can appreciate that it is better to spend more on a known working back, rather than chance it with a questionable one. I think KEH may be the way to go on this one. I have had bought from there before and they seem to have very honest ratings. <br> Thanks for the links Brian, I wasn't aware that the matching of inserts with the case doesn't really matter all that much. It will definitely save me a couple bucks. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ng Posted June 13, 2010 Author Share Posted June 13, 2010 <p>...well that was up until I learned that the shipping is $40. Guess that's the premium one pays for fedex - which also means high customs charges. The postage and customs probably works out to cost as much as the back itself. Too bad they don't offer the cheaper USPS.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now