Possibilities for a 94 mpX (verison simulation) Canon

<p>Bob, are you saying that you are not open to theoretical expectation mechanics? Sensors have come along way since sony's semiconductor.</p>

<p>Steven, all I was trying is that a force (AFM) observations show that under specific growth conditions, step flow shift has taken place, independent of the HD sensor layer thickness. For the surface morphology and roughness in 105μm x 105μm areas, we attain values of root-mean-square (rms) as high as 300 nm for the best luminance sample. XDL investigations of the compressive orthorhombic biaxial layer pitch indicate that the relaxation may not network a conventional expected relaxation, and as evidenced for Rxm films epitaxially manufactured by radio sputtering. Grow of the layer with mismatch 15 % of a lattice generate inordinately large density defects.<br>

The devices will only be used on the field through charge distributions. Maybe the wrong forum for this question. EOS sensors have relatively low d-states.</p>

<p>Oh boy, I don't understand what you say either - sorry. But I noticed you mention cooling the sensor to a lower temperature, which doesn't work with current sensors. Well some people have been experimenting with old EOS300D/Rebel (CCD sensor), which makes a very nice response to cooling down (a small fan clears up the signal more than 10 times, i.e. ISO100 noise @ ISO1600). If I'd want to experiment with camera sensors, the 300D Rebel would be the camera to get...</p>

<p>Stanley Unwin lives again!</p>

<p><em>"Stanley Unwin lives again!"</em><br>

<em></em> <br>

Hardly, Raffy isn't even close to Unwin's mastery of Gobbledegook.<br>

Anyway Robin, thanks for the reminder, it brings back many happy memories!</p>

<p>Sounds like a troll to me...</p>

<p>But why stop at 94Megapixels - what about 130Megapixels on an affordable home-made camera <br>

<a href="http://people.cs.ubc.ca/~heidrich/Papers/EG.04.pdf">http://people.cs.ubc.ca/~heidrich/Papers/EG.04.pdf</a></p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>Steven, all I was trying is that a force (AFM) observations show that under specific growth conditions, step flow shift has taken place, independent of the HD sensor layer thickness.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>A big problem with the AFM approach is that the total scanning area is limited to just about 200 micrometers squared. Obviously, this is orders of magnitude smaller than typical sensors intended for single shot captures.</p>

<p>Assuming that extended view times are possible, I'd suggest trying stitching together accumulated fields. Stepper stage precision and repeatability issues might be dominant, however. </p>

<p>Look to Lucas-Kanade class optical flow algorithms for identifying identical features field to field. Maybe use motion templates for a first order positional estimate. </p>

<p>Note that the AFM returns true depth information. So, I'd start thinking about LK extensions for this additional dimensional axis.</p>

<p>Finally, Raffy, I don't think this effort is quite good enough for a try at the Loebner Prize yet. Get in touch with Eugene Goostman. He's a rather friendly chap but a bit hard to reach. You can also try Vladimir Veselov at the Mozhaisky Military Space Engineering Institute, in St. Petersburg, Russia.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>I'm also bemused by "taking it UP to the Antarctic".....where are you starting from exactly?</p>

</blockquote>

<p>He's a troll, you know where they come from. From the, err... "underworld", all destinations in the real world are "up".</p>

<p>In the case of this troll, it appears he's using one of the dozens of "random jargon generating" programs on the net, fed with the MIT "allwords" list, then a few replacements of the resulting technobabble with relevant Canon or photographic terms, such as the deliberately misspelled "censor". Here's one from a medical jargon generator</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Non-toxic non-permissive methodologies show that Raffy has novel upstream agents in his non-androgenic pathophysiological pathway.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>I only added "show that" "Raffy has" and "in his", the random generator did the real work. Random generators are fun...</p>

<blockquote>

<p>All attempts to analyze the baryon disturbance with the alternate polarizing coil have failed. Our problems with the tertiary polarizing regulator might be resolved by using the primary ionizing transducer. We need the high-energy tachyon polarizing regulator to stop the decay of the focused star before the ship is destroyed!</p>

</blockquote>

<p>No matter what you need, from random Alanis Morisette style songs, to electronics jargon, to kung-fu movie scripts, there's a random generator out there for it...</p>

<p>Now, I am quite disappointed in Raffy's trolling this time around. Have a look at his posting history, he only does this every few years, and the last one was very wild, talking about the "romantic" quality of Hasselblad vs. Mamiya lenses. That was a much better effort than his current trolling, it required paragraphs of actual creative writing. This one just requites a few clicks to get the basic paragraph of technobabble, then the insertion of "EOS", "censor", etc...</p>

<p>It's hard to get decent trolls any more.</p>

<p>Raffy, I know how to do it and have done it thousands of times, even with the couple charge inverted to get fluctuations out of the magnetic plate. But since you have all the concepts wrong I think you should work on your idea at least for the next 12 years in your basement, and then you will know the correct questions to ask.</p>

<p>Best,<br /> Diego.</p>

<p>Robert, am I correct in understanding AFM is Atomic Force Microscope?</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Robert, am I correct in understanding AFM is Atomic Force Microscope?</p>

</blockquote>

<p><a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','5','','0CCUQFjAE')" href="http://www.afmracing.org/"><em>American Federation of Motorcyclists</em></a></p>

<p>The last time I attempted a similar project I needed to research some lesser known coordinated non-sequential determinants on CMOS-CCP. Pragmatic cross-disciplinary parameters just don't apply. A computerized transformational dialogue with contemporary educative insights was extremely helpful. If you can tweak a coordinated terminological reappraisal back towards a more intuitive vertically-structured context, then I think you'll have it.<br>

Dang it, the pancake fell off my head again.</p>

<p>Canon Sucks. Use Nikon.</p>

<p>If you didn't come here to be teased where do you go?</p>

<p>Where did that come from...Robert?</p>

<p>What do you plan to do, make an image the size of <strong><em>KANSAS?</em></strong></p>

<p>I think Joseph W hit it on the head. </p>

<p>

<p>I have been reading this threat and am amazed that no one has pointed out that the scheme can’t work due to the coriolis effect. This will interfere with the spin coupling, which of course is need for this whole thing to work. Then there is the photon to electron state decoherence with as we all know created problem in the hyper fine structure of the resonate state equations.</p>

</p>

<p>I have came to Photo.net quite a few times now for for over a year for general photographic advice, Nikon film and Canon digital, and i have always been blessed with much honest (i hope!) advice and numerous suggestions that have been of great help and inspiration to me. In addition i have learned much from reading numerous posts and the many responses placed on photo.net by other members and thus i have very much felt a 'part' of this world-wide friendly community that profess a love for PHOTOGRAPHY ... <br>

But tonight, whilst relaxing after the long happy day that has been my wee daughter's 4rth birthday (with my Guiness and my large dram beside me), not only have i learned something tonight - not sure what - but i have been greatly entertained! What a great post, pertinent and insightful responses, and what a great photograph of a wabbit and a PANCAKE - priceless! </p>

<p>Thank you Raffy! </p>

<p>I think i know what a troll is now! </p>

<p>Donaldo<br>

:-))</p>

 

<p>Most/all CCD and CMOS sensors have a non-sensor "border" around them, so tiling them will leave large areas between each sensor, with the "wall-of-TVs" image result. If this is all you have ...... There seem to be easier ways to achive higher pixel-count formats, using only 3 sensors, that reduce the computational effect of non-sequential determinants to negligible levels, and also circumvent any coriolis-effect restrictions. Lab-coat time everyone, and do not remove them until the safety light indicates it is safe to do so.</p>

<p>As hinted at in a previous post, take a page from the 3-sensor video cameras: use a dichroic prism behind the lens brand of your choice, and then get 3 sensors of your choice, one for each color channel. 24Mp sensors seem plentiful now, so a 72Mp system could be built, and might fit inside a Hasselblad 1600. If size is no object, use LF lenses and 3 scanners, as per the .PDF linked in a preceding post.</p>

<p>Remove the color filter from each sensor, then carefully adjust the focus distance for each color channel sensor for maximum resolution. At a minimum, you'll get 3 exact focus points: APO performance from pre-APO- and non-APO lenses. With experimentation and careful adjustment, you should achieve Super-APO, and maybe better, resolution.</p>

<p>Now you have some software to write. You must correctly combine the data from each channel, pixel-by-pixel, in addition to the usual camera controls (shutter control, ISO selection, white-balance, etc). As this has already been done for other formats, starting with existing code should be a simple matter. </p>

<p>Has anyone checked to see if yoyodyne propuslion systems is missing an oscillation overthruster?</p>

<p>I thought this post was about censorship, not electronics or cameras. </p>

<p>I like what Kelly Flanigan said. Makes about as much cense as anything else I have read on this thread.</p>

<p>--Lannie</p>

<p>I'm looking for one of these thingamajigs also. I saw one once, but it had a scratch.</p>

<p>Thank you, Joseph W, for the educational post. I wasn't aware of random generators, but it was obvious from the start that this was all made up. I've known guys like this in college, that were all talk and made stuff up. But after any sort of discourse, it is quickly evident that certain individuals are full of cr@&.</p>

<p>Still, this post was good for a quick laugh...before it became tiresome, anyway.</p>

<p>The technical aspects of this dialogue create quite a dichotomy between reasoned and rational discourse and the <strong><em>highly </em></strong>theoretical permutations broached by quasi-mathematical integration of a futuristic reality. However, urgency suggests the more pressing question needing to be answered is "<em>How</em> do they train rabbits to do that and not eat the pancake?"</p>