MC 200mm or MC 150mm?

<p>Hello, what do you think is better between 4.5/200 and 3.5/150 MC lenses?<br>

I like doing landscapes and nature photography.<br>

thank you.</p>

<p>I've already got a 2.8/50mm MC, a EII 2.8/75mm (but this lens has some problem) and an MC 3.5/150mm.<br>

I'm thinking to change 150 for 200. Is it a good idea?</p>

<p>I wouldn't do it, the 150 is a nice lens and you won't benefit much from that 50mm difference. If your 75 has issues I would rather take care of that.</p>

<p>I wouldn't do it, either. The 150mm is a fantastic lens for portraits, too. The 75mm might be the single best lens in Bronica's lineup. If yours is having problems just get another one and be done with it. If you already have a 150mm and you never use your 75mm I would suggest getting the 50mm since you do landscapes. </p>

<p>I decide to don't sell the 150. It's so a beautiful lens to give it away.<br>

In the future I'll try to find a 40mm or another 75mm.<br>

And what do you think about the mc 105, instead?</p>