Jump to content

POW - 8/9/09


bob_marz

Recommended Posts

<p>Markus, I saw that same Karl display in the window of a teddy-bear shot in Nürnberg last fall. <br>

George, looks like your patience was rewarded, nice exposure. I assume it was rated 100; you had to overexpose it by a whole stop to get proper exposure, or is that just to get the contrast/grain you wanted? Was the film long-expired?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

<p>I'm out of time. Could I just say praise for this wonderful photographic diversity ?</p>

<p>here's my week's choice<br>

<img src="http://static.zoom.nl/56813C63BCE2D992AC800E964CE38C00.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="442" /><br>

going home after a sweet day sailing<br>

'<br>

next is the story of Fluffy...... a featherdown on a laserdisc (no pp)<br>

<img src="http://static.zoom.nl/ECEA6D6DEA15B5F807C3901CBC350660.jpg" alt="" width="672" height="700" /><br>

Fluffy in heaven<br>

Fluffy on the edge<br>

Fluffy is gay<br>

Fluffy hung over<br>

Fluffy is feeling blue<br>

Fluffy has seen the light</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Andrew: I've been shooting (non-expired) Acros at 100 and 80 based on Fuji's times but it's always been very flat for me (scanned at least, I've yet to wet print from the negatives but I hope to one night this week) plus I'm lazy about developers, I try to keep it simple. This roll was metered at 80 (and developed for the same) but I remember shooting these few frames about a stop overexposed to see what would happen: I got better skin tones and contrast. Got a few rolls left which I'm going to try metered at 50 but overall I think I'll go back to FP4+ which just seems to shoot well no matter what for me...</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

<p >My favorites this week:</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Bob M, I still dig Road to Cadillac</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Markus, the shot of the two musicians is very sweet, one for their portfolio</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Ben P. nice dreamy shot of the fish. I’d adjust the brightness and contrast up some.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Robert C. another lovely landscape. Ospreys are fun to watch.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Ronny P., another funny shot with Bargains.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Dave H. beautiful setup and DOF for the ‘shrooms. You liking the Voigtlander? The 125mm is heavy and I imagine that the 180mm is even heavier, though as you have demonstrated the optics are excellent.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Steve T. Lake City has great vertical lines and clouds. Good one for B&W.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Jemal, the shot of Destiny is so fine, especially with the popup flash. Her skin tones are lovely. Very nice. Among the best this week.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Somanna, those shots look like my neighborhood. B&W is a hair better, is the shot tilted slightly to the right?</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Camus, all really fine shots. I cannot decide on the better of the color vs. B&W.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Denise, that’s funny.</p>

<p > </p>

<p >Dorus, I like the fluffy images a bit better than the captions.</p>

<p > </p>

<p > </p>

<p >Thank you Somanna for your kind words. Thanks Jemal. Haig, yep it’s cold and wet, but next week is supposed to be “normal” in the mid-80s.</p>

<p > </p>

<p > </p>

<p >ME</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...