Troll Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 Would someone compare these, please. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Kahn Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 The July issue of <i>Shutterbug</i> magazine has an <A HREF="http://shutterbug.com/equipmentreviews/software_computers/0708quiet/">article</A> comparing Noise Ninja, Neat Image and two other products. Check it out.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trunfio Posted July 12, 2008 Share Posted July 12, 2008 noiseware professional. check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted July 12, 2008 Author Share Posted July 12, 2008 Thanks for the help. Wilhelm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lheusinkveld Posted July 13, 2008 Share Posted July 13, 2008 I made my decision a while ago by downloading the free trial from both programs and comparing the results, as well as the ease of use etc etc. I decided on Neat Image, and have been very happy with it, but YMMV. Louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted July 14, 2008 Share Posted July 14, 2008 Ditto the recommendation from Louise. Download the trial versions. Give 'em all a thorough shakedown. In my case, I preferred Noise Ninja, mostly for the slightly quicker response on my older PC and the more intuitive interface. It does all I need for my D2H and Olympus C-3040Z files. Files from later cameras might do better with other software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin starks pics Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 <p>I just downloaded the Pro Version of Noise Ninja based on what I heard in this forum. It was $79.95 (or $108.50 Canadian)I am very impressed using it with my new Canon 50D and 24-70 f2.8 and 70-200 f 2.8 lens shot at ISO 2500 1/500 f2.8. I've just used it at the automatic setting for now and was wondering when to do the sharpening (Unsharp Mask) before or after using Noise Ninja. I'm submitting a gymnastic shot taken last weekend under terrible lighting...my handheld meter read an incident metering of 1/500 f2.8 at ISO 2500. I was afraid to go higher to ISO 3200 ...what do you think? I'd be happy to receive any advice since I'm also covering larger meets in the near future..</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now