randrew1 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I posted a Kodachrome ABC's thread in the No Words forum. The idea is to get 26 different Kodachrome images with a title to represent each letter of the alphabet. (Apple, Boy, Church, Dog, etc.) It seems there aren't enough people with Kodachrome images available who frequent the No Words forum to keep this going. If you are a fan of Kodachrome and have some images available, take a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlesBecker-Toronto Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 ok-just added 'V' for you; Venice 1978. cb :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I'm going to leave this post up because it really is a clever idea. But for the record, making "go look at this thread" posts is something that photo.net can't allow. With 20,000 posts a week, there will always be people who want to get more attention to their thread. We start allowing it, and the site will quickly be covered with "go look at my thread" posts. Which, I have a feeling, would be pretty annoying to a lot of people. Thus filling my inbox with more angry email. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick_mont Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I am going to go post right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_276104 Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 Just posted one for "S". I haven't shot any Kodachrome myself, but have scanned some of my dad's slides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Crowe Posted December 2, 2008 Share Posted December 2, 2008 I added "P". I quickly discovered that I could do A to Z with Kodachrome 25 and 64, with little trouble! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_dalton Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 <p>I just got my 1988 expired Kodachrome 200 back with great results. I made use of the 200 speed and shot mostly indoor without flash with a 1.2 lens. It's proof that there's nothing wrong with 20 year old film. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_dalton Posted December 11, 2008 Share Posted December 11, 2008 <p>I just got my 1988 expired Kodachrome 200 back with great results. I made use of the 200 speed and shot mostly indoor without flash with a 1.2 lens. It's proof that there's nothing wrong with 20 year old film. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now