Jump to content

"New" (Rollei) Tech Pan


arjun_mehra

Recommended Posts

I stick to Imagelink to. I have bought the 36 frame canisters, but if any one know where to buy 30 meter, please

telle me. Or if it is possible to buy it on larger rolls, so i can cut my own 120 and 4x5" That would be like a

dream to use with quality optics. But my opinion is: Stop wining over the discontinued TechPan! Buy Imagelink HQ

in large quanta, so Kodak keeps it alive. The bad thing is that Kodak doesnt tell people the are making this

superb film!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just tried a roll of the Rollei Technical Pan and had it developed in their ATP DC developer. I'll post some scans when I'm able. I've also shot Kodak Imagelink HQ and when I brought it to the lab, I told them it was Tech Pan and to develop it normally in Technidol. I have to say that the result was quite nice, altho Imagelink HQ has an intense curl to it. If you shoot Imagelink HQ, rate it at 25 and try bracketing to get a feel, altho I rated my entire roll at 20 and didn't have a problem. Kodak also makes Imagelink FS film which is a stop faster at 50. The main difference between Imagelink films vs. Kodak/Rollei Tech Pan is the lack of extended red sensitivity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The primary buying issue with Imagelink HQ is large minimum orders, a case of at least 20 rolls of 30 meters each. This is the way microfilming services WANT to buy microfilm, so that they can calibrate up one lot of film, and then keep using identical rolls of film without further testing or adjustment.

 

Some, but not all, of Kodak's films on Estar-AH (polyester) base are curl-prone. 2475 Recording is curly, but Technical Pan isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lighting conditions were the classic patchy sunlight filtering through trees which is not the best for films

like the ATP. The suit of armor was mostly in the shade and was easy to meter, so that turned out well. I

cropped off the patch of sunlight shining on the top of the helmet that was overexposed.

 

I am going to try the low contrast developer soon and post some results.

 

As for the Zeiss lenses, there is a reason Zeiss has been so popular over the years. As Contax cameras are out

of production you can get a body and some extremely good lenses for a song these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...