Jump to content

Best Lens for Street on a 5D, zoom or prime ?


jon_kobeck1

Recommended Posts

I have a 5D and a 24-70 2.8L set up. I am not too thrilled with the weight of that lens on the streets on New York city. I am wondering if its

just ME or the Lense. as I am told that lens is one of the best out there for the 5D. I want something ideal for street photography in an

urban area like NYC. I was thinking the 24 1.4L(and sell my 24-70) or mybe an even wider zoom. I like fast wide lenses. I dont know, I am

confused. I wish I could afford ALL the lenses. Have a look at my site and any feedback appreciated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me you don't like weight.

 

The Tamron 28 - 300mm VC will give you tremendous flexibility and is light with great quality.

 

There is nothing like an L lens. Canon makes a 28 - 300mm zoom but, you might as well hang a brick from your camera.

 

Your alternative is to leave the DSLR format and get a P & S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand where you're coming from.

 

I was shooting with a friend Friday who had the same body and lens. Tried it out, but it was just way too heavy for me. I

guess that's going to keep me in crop-body cameras for awhile. My cam and equiv zoom was about 1/3 the weight and

maybe half the volume.

 

Not great for darkness, but great for one-handed SP.

www.citysnaps.net
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jon,

 

I looked at the street photos on your website and it seems that you shoot in the 35mm-50mm lens range quite a bit. I did not look

at the embedded data in the photos though:)

 

For small and light and fast nothing will beat the 35mm f2.0. It's a fine lens and is light enough to easily shoot without looking

through the viewfinder. And it's so small, it's easy to throw it in your pocket and pull out a 50mm 1.8 or 1.4.

 

I have the 24mm 2.8 also, but find it's just too wide for most "street style" photography, but heck, if you have an extra pocket you

can carry that too.

 

The good news is also that the 35mm 2.0 is only $240 and a 50mm 1.8 is only $90 (but it's not so well built). The Canon f1.4L

and f1.2L primes are kind of heavy and, to me, defeat the purpose of a light lens for walking around with. I also don't like the look

of f1.4 or f1.2 except for very special circumstances. f2.0 has quite shallow depth of focus as well, and for a lot less money and

weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking at using my D700 with 50mm f/1.8 on the street soon, which lens you use is personal preference I think. I've never see the point of zooms for this type of photography.

 

Out of interest, do you find you are more conspicuous with a camera this size rather than with a smaller one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jon:

 

I would do some more research on what you really need/want.

 

The EF24/1.4 is only about 4 oz lighter than the 24-105...and weight seems to be your main criterion.

 

Maybe you need a lighter body. The XSi/XTi body is about 12 oz lighter than the 5D.

 

Have a look at the Canon SLR Home Page. All the camera & lens specs are there:

 

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ProductCatIndexAct&fcategoryid=111

 

You could also look here for lens reviews and comparison shots:

 

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/

 

There is a "lens focal length" comparison tool here:

 

http://www.tamron.com/lenses/learning_center/tools/focal-length-comparison.php

 

If the neck strap is causing you grief, maybe you could try a hand-strap (could actually be better for street

than a neck strap because the camera is always "at hand"). I bought some of these (link below), use them on a

40D and an EOS 3 and think they are pretty darn good:

 

http://www.camdapter.com/

 

Cheers! Jay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely love my 24mm 1.4L. It is by far my favorite lens, but it is not that light, and, to be honest, I couldn't shoot a

decent street photo to save my life. I thought the "real" street photographers liked the 35 to 50mm lenses. The answer

is probably to rent a couple of lenses for a long weekend. The choice will probably be obvious to you after do that. Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a 24 f/1.4L all the time when I'm out w/ my 40D (which is a little bit longer than a 35 with the crop

factor). It's not that heavy, at least IMO, and it gets the photos I want. Approaching someone with a zoom is a

bit more difficult, but it's not impossible. Gilden's style isn't for everybody, but it does produce interesting,

albeit disarming results. I would also go with renting a few lenses to try them out and make a decision after

that. Shooting from the hip is really fun, and experimenting can make those long walks much more pleasant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take is that Gilden is using something very wide on that video. He is shooting very close to the "victims" and perspective doesn't seems too close. The Lens may be 24mm or even 21mm.

 

In my opinion camera and lens are there to allow you to materialize what you have in your brain. In the case of Gilden's video he shoots very close, but background is still blurred. He needs something portable, wide and with a fast aperture. That is what lets him to do what he wants to do. He choose a Leica for that, but he could have used a 450D with a 24f/2.8 is he'd thought it be fine for him.

 

With the 5D and the 24-70 f/2.8 you have a great platform to find out which focal lengths are more useful for you of the f/2.8 enough for you.

 

So, what do you want to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...