Jump to content

**Name of this forum changed (slightly)**


joshroot

Recommended Posts

Howdy Classic Camera folks.

 

I have changed the name of this forum slightly. As we move further and further along the photographic timeline,

the "pre 1970" date designation was getting more and more useless.

 

So the name of this forum is now "Classic Manual Cameras" with the goal that it encompass all cameras up to the

electronic/autofocus era. If it's manual, it has a home in this forum. Although, obviously, some camera systems

are probably better served in their respective forums (Canon FD, Leica, or Medium Format being good examples). But you

get the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So now, if I have a Minolta manual focus question I come here and not to the Sony (ha ha) forum? Not that I cared

to go there much anyway, having to pick through too much digital stuff to find if my question had been asked

before. I believe eventually this area will turn into the 35mm film camera ghetto. It's bad enough to deal with

certain sorts of brand snobbery as it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<i>"Autoexposure came in well before 1970. Where can we discuss older cameras with that feature?"</i>

<p>

Is this a serious question? Come on. It's pretty obvious what cameras fit into the discussion realm here and which do not. Just take half a minute to read the threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Autoexposure came in well before 1970. Where can we discuss older cameras with that feature?"

 

Uh, Josh, I think it was a serious question. The pre-1970 cut-off provided a known limit, however well or poorly it worked.

 

I was going to ask a similar question myself.

 

I assume from your response that, going by past threads and their general trends, we're now looking at pre-auto-everything and certainly no digital cameras, with some flexibility regarding dates of manufacture.

 

So I assume that somebody posting the occasional aperture- or shutter-priority camera from the late-60s or early-70s has nothing to worry about.

 

Now for the next thing: I'm all for it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is good.

 

Josh made a reference to "medium format". I hope that classic (pre-1970, all-manual, or whatever you want to call it) MF cameras such as classic folders and TLRs still belong here, while the MF forum is still for not-so-archaic and digital MF, as in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Medium format is medium format. If someone wants to ask about a classic folder in the Med Format forum, they are welcome to do so. Likewise, if someone wants to ask about a Hassy 500c here, I guess they are welcome to do so as well, after all, that camera was introduced in '57 or something like that.

 

However, a user has to ask themselves "Where am I likely to get the best answer to my question?". I'd say that Hassy users are going to be more plentiful in the Med Format forum and folder users more plentiful in the Classic Forum. But that's just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...