csfrankland Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Hi, I purchased a Nikon 17-35mm AF-S Zoom-Nikkor Lens f/2.8-f/22 a year ago to usewith my old 35mm Nikon N80. I recently converted to digital with a Nikon D80.Should I keep my 17-35mm Nikon lens or sell it to purchase another lens moresuitable for digital photography? I'm not really sure. I could probably get back what I paid for the Nikon lens (around $900), but isthere anything better out there for the same sort of money or should I hold ontothis one? Advice much appreciated! Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two23 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 I would absolutely keep it, and use it for what you used to shoot with a 28-70mm. The lens is one of Nikon's best. Kent in SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_sevigny Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 I second that opinion. It's a fantastic lens and the focal length is well suited to digital photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntv666 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 This is a legend lens. It's gold Man . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_a2 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Christopher....My 17-35 has lived on my D70, then my D200, and now my D300. The 50mm 1.8 and something long always comes along, but the 17-35 is my "serious" on-camera wide lens. You didn't say what other lenses you have, or how you shoot, but you can always add a 12-24mm or 10-20mm down the road if you tended to favor the 17mm end of the 17-35 on your N80. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josephwalsh Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 I faced the same situation Christopher. (as have many, many others) Rather than sell I decided to keep it and see how much I used it. After a while I realized I was using my 10-20 Sigma, 18-70 Nikkor and 35mm 1.4 MF Nikkor instead. I don't know if I shot 200 frames in two years with the 17-35. Still, I kept it thinking if I ever again used my F100 I'd want it. I held onto the 17-35 for a couple of years. Then, a month ago, I sold my F100 after which I also sold the 17-35. If I ever get a full frame digital D3 (unlikely) or a less expensive full frame Nikon of the future (quite likely) I plan to get the 14-24 2.8 which will, I believe, be a better digital performer and deliver that important (to me) 3mm wider view. FWIW, I am happy with the Sigma and it will cost you far less than what you'll get for the 17-35. Of course, if you ever plan to get that 14-24 in the future you may, like me, have to sell a kidney! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_becker2 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 The only reason to sell it is if it doesn't meet your needs. For my use the range and speed out weigh the limit at the long end. A 24-70mm f2.8 would cover the rest. Everything I have ever read about this lens is great. I would keep it. IMHO it makes much more sense than the 14-24 f2.8 unless you have a special wide need. If it was not so big, heavy and expensive I would have had one years ago. Alas I now have some primes in that range and the only thing I have gained is speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juanjo_viagran Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Christopher, the 17-35mm 2.8 AFS is a KEEPER, agreed with all other replies. Instead of selling it get him a soul mate. <img src="http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc112/Juanjo_Viagran/BS/2337ac34.jpg"> that's a couple made in heaven.. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wing8 Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Sell it to me, I will give it a good home :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_martin5 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Have you considered replacing it with the Nikon 17 - 55mm f/2.8, which is a DX lens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d.olson Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Don't even consider selling it. You have a gem now, the 17-35, 28-70 and the 70-200 are a combination that can't be beat. Digital or film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now