pietro_chelli1 Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Hello everyone! i am writing this post, because I am in the process of deciding what 135 tryingto find/purchase. More than technical differences (like the best coating/resolution/coverage) etc.it would be very especially nice to hear comments on the "feel" of these lenses. Also, if someone has images that they took with these lenses, that would bebeautiful to see, especially portraits or environmental portraits, but also everything else that could give me an idea of the lens peculiarity. Thanks to everyone and Kind Regards pietro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Stop 'em down to f:22 and I doubt that you can tell the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_fromm2 Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Um, how about coverage? Pietro, why are you so intent on the wrong thing, not on what really matters? And why don't you tell us what format you're shooting, your budget, and what you're trying to accomplish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbg90455 Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Optically, the Apo-Sironar is the by far the "best," but it you need the speed of the Xenotar (for, say, hand-held shots of a Crown Graphic), then the Xenotar is the "best." Of course, you may have to offer your first-born to get a good Xenotar 135 these days. The Xenar is probably a distant third in any measure -- unless, of course, you're planning to shoot landscapes tripod-mounted at f22 or so, then defraction will make them all the same (as Bill already mentioned). So, in summary, it all depends ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erie_patsellis Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 You forgot Fujinon W's, Symmar-S and Componon's (if you do tabletop or close up/detail work). Bill's correct, at f22, you'd likely be unable to tell the difference. erie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucecahn Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Rodenstock S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pietro_chelli1 Posted March 4, 2008 Author Share Posted March 4, 2008 Ok. I obviously write in a very poor english these days. What I really ment, and what I would like to hear, is not quality comparisons on the lens performances, but personal views on the "feel" of the images produced by those (and other ones maybe) lenses. I am, indeed concerned on what really matters, and not at all on the lens coverage. I would like to understand, if for example, a Xenotar is a softer lens particularly nice for portraits. Or if one of these lenses renders better in black and white than in colour, because of its way to reproduce colour contrast. By the way I shoot environmental portraits. Thanks for everyone responses in any case. There is always something new to learn! Ciao pietro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_galli4 Posted March 4, 2008 Share Posted March 4, 2008 Pietro, you should add the 150 APO Lanthar to your list. Or even the more common f4.5 Heliar. Excellent in the "feel" department. A Sironar S is one of the sharpest lenses on earth but may be clinical for your tastes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pietro_chelli1 Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 It really would be great to see some images taken with these lenses. I am really curious to see images taken with the Xenotar 3.5- Thank to all for your contributions. pietro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
profhlynnjones Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Apo Sironar is 70 degree coverage, superb color, fine lens, good close focus. Xenotars were truly excelent high speed lenses, about 56 degrees coverage, technically not as good in color (but most observers could not tell that) but a lens that I have valued over the years for press cameras. Xenar, 4 element tessar type, 56 degrees coverage, sure that you can test it before you buy it, quality is sometimes variable. Lynn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now