Jump to content

Hard infinity stops on 200mm Schneider lenses?


Ian Rance

Recommended Posts

I have the majority of lenses for the Kodak Retina Reflex. On the 200mm lens I

have, the split image shows infinity reached at a lens marking of 30 feet. If

I turn the lens to marked infinity, the split has gone past 'aligned'.

 

Several bodies all read the same.

 

Which is correct for these lenses - focused image or marked distance?

 

Thanks for any info,

 

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check that the rear elements of your lens were a) not installed backwards as I once did on a Soligor 200m lens or b) not unscrewed slightly as happened on my Nikkor 85mm. Both of these lenses focused past infinity. I assume your gear is OK but just in case.

 

In 1999 or so a similar matter came up on the LUG. If a lens focuses past infinity it could be by design to compensate for thermal expansion of the lens. A warm lens will be longer. Focusing past infinity means making the focal length shorter -- going past the focal length not past infinity in object space. So a warm lens that focuses past infinity is OK. That said I have never experienced this effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miles raises a good point, and this is what came to mind when I read Ian's question. In fact, I once read that current lenses (Canon EF lenses to be specific) are designed with this thermal expansion in mind, so I assumed, perhaps wrongly, that older cameras may have had the same design feature. Even if this is the case though, a lens turned to infinity should be in focus, while still allowing the photographer to turn a bit farther than the infinity mark.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...