Ian Rance Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 I have the majority of lenses for the Kodak Retina Reflex. On the 200mm lens I have, the split image shows infinity reached at a lens marking of 30 feet. If I turn the lens to marked infinity, the split has gone past 'aligned'. Several bodies all read the same. Which is correct for these lenses - focused image or marked distance? Thanks for any info, Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riccardo_mottola Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 if you verified the Problem on several bodies you can exclude the misalignment of the mirror/ground glass. Thus I would saythe correct is the focused image, not the marked distance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johan_de_groote Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 I have a CZJ 180/2.8 for the Pentacon6 that has a similar "past infinity" thing. Only difference is that there infinity is at the infinity mark, but you can turn further than infinity. This isn't a fault, it is supposed to make focussing easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Rance Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 Thank you for your input. On my lens, the infinity mark does not match with the focus on the screen (of a distant object). Only one way to be sure - I will run some test shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miles_s. Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Check that the rear elements of your lens were a) not installed backwards as I once did on a Soligor 200m lens or b) not unscrewed slightly as happened on my Nikkor 85mm. Both of these lenses focused past infinity. I assume your gear is OK but just in case. In 1999 or so a similar matter came up on the LUG. If a lens focuses past infinity it could be by design to compensate for thermal expansion of the lens. A warm lens will be longer. Focusing past infinity means making the focal length shorter -- going past the focal length not past infinity in object space. So a warm lens that focuses past infinity is OK. That said I have never experienced this effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Collins Posted December 13, 2007 Share Posted December 13, 2007 Miles raises a good point, and this is what came to mind when I read Ian's question. In fact, I once read that current lenses (Canon EF lenses to be specific) are designed with this thermal expansion in mind, so I assumed, perhaps wrongly, that older cameras may have had the same design feature. Even if this is the case though, a lens turned to infinity should be in focus, while still allowing the photographer to turn a bit farther than the infinity mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arjun_mehra Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 My 4/300 Zeiss Sonnar focuses a bit past infinity. From what I learned about this when it concerned me, the item is designed this way so it'll reach infinity in various weather/temperature conditions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now