silverscape Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 (Thanks to Glenn Mabbutt for getting this going!)<p> Well, I finally decided to experiment with some depth of field effects with my Argus camera. I know it might not seem like a big deal, but for me it is! I'm still new to all this, so I feel like I've just learned a new trick! :)<p> I just took these pictures around my neighborhood this afternoon.<p> So here goes...<p> <img src="http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/October_30_2007.jpg">< br> I really liked this one. It seemed like the perfect fall picture. I just took it on my front yard.<p> <img src="http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/October_30_2007_d.jpg" ><p> I used 100 ISO Kodak "Ultra Color" film. The f-stop was 5.6, and the shutter speed was 1/200. It was a little overcast and hazy today, so I figured that was a safe exposure...or good enough guess anyway!<p> Here are a couple of other pictures I took, just for comparison. These were with f-16 or f-11 in the shade, and 1/100 shutter speed. (Same film).<p> <img src="http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/October_30_2007_c.jpg" ><br> This is probably a little underexposed...but actually I prefer that sometimes anyway. The details seem a little sharper.<p> <img src="http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f86/gatewaycityca/October_30_2007_b.jpg" ><br> I was actually surprised at how this one turned out. I didn't think it would pick up that much color because the sky was kind of overcast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick j dempsey Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 If you are shooting into the sky its always safe to underexpose by 1 to 2 stops. Great results from the Brick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User_503771 Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Your photos and exposures look great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in Austin Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Well the shutter is accurate enough, but you forgot my favorite set of test shots with the Cintar, a brick wall from 10 feet, then 20 feet. I hope you enjoy the brick. It seems to of outlasted many of its contemporaries. Best Regards - Andrew in Austin, TX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis triguez Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 The Argus lens has a good performance. I love the two first shoots. Well done Chris. Something curious about the Cintar 50: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-37355.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn_mabbutt Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Ah, so you have one of those fancy-schmancy ones that has a 1/200 :p Mine just has 1/100, and then 1/300. Good shots! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Currie Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Nice I have yet to get my tag sale brick operational (one of those cases in which the shutter gave its last valiant gasp of life on the table and then died happy when purchased). But I've always been impressed with the quality I got from the C-4 cintar. I like # 2 and 4 best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverscape Posted October 31, 2007 Author Share Posted October 31, 2007 Thanks for the replies and feedback everyone! More pictures to follow soon! LOL...yup Glenn, I got a fancy "top of the line" Argus I guess, because it also has a neat little ASA dial on the back of the film door. It doesn't do anything, just reminds you of what ASA film you put in! You might as well just write it down on a stick note tab and stick it on the camera somewhere. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamsid Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 Quite nice. What scanner did you use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golden Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 very nice images, great work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverscape Posted November 1, 2007 Author Share Posted November 1, 2007 Thanks. The scanner is an HP Photosmart CS5180, combined printer, scanner, and copier. I've been happy with HP scanners. I didn't edit the sanned images at all...they look pretty much the same as the original pictures. Maybe a tiny bit darker, but otherwise pretty darn close to the originals. HP scanners seem to be the best for getting accurate colors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now