elliot1 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 http://www.digitalreview.ca/Content/Nikon-D3-Digital-Camera-Sample-Images.shtml If you have ever shot pictures of baseball (at night), you will certainlyappreciate how good these pictures really are. Look closely at the ISOsettings, shutter speeds and picture quality. Thought it was also interesting (coincidence) that the Nikon banner was in 4 ofthe 5 shots! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rene11664880918 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Hi Elliot! It is empty here so I'll reply! Those shots look really great! I'm sure this camera will really cause a storm in the PRO world. After seeing those shots now I know exactly what I need! And that is 20K's I think that would cover the camera and a couple of those glasses! Thanks for that link! Rene' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stan_belyaev Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 The skin of the players looks horrible. Why is it green? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daverhaas Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 Stan - Not sure what image you're looking at, but on my monitor the skin tones look fine. Perhaps the white balance could be tweaked a little bit, but nothing major. Now I just wish that I had the $20k laying around to buy this gear! Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_harris15 Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 The skin tones look fine to be. I am gobsmacked by the image quality at ISO 6400. Very impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew robertson Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 On my calibrated Cinema Display the skin tones do look a bit sickly, especially in the topmost shot. But, this is probably just a case of improper white balance which is easily fixed. The high ISO shots are amazing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew robertson Posted September 30, 2007 Share Posted September 30, 2007 "Now I just wish that I had the $20k laying around to buy this gear!" Sorry for the DP, but the camera's $5000 not $20,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greglyon Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 $20k = D3 + the (mostly) new nikon glass used in the shots...300f2.8 afs vr, 500f4 afs vr, 200-400f4 afs vr! Sure would be nice to own/use. I can't wait to hear/see more hands on reviews of both D3 and D300! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_luongo1 Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 I think the white balance issue is simply a case that these are under artificial light with a weird spectrum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfreemanphotography Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Wow! I can't wait to see some nice long exposures taken with this camera! When will there be a FX sensor in a Dx00 body? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew robertson Posted October 1, 2007 Share Posted October 1, 2007 Long exposures will be the real test. I have an R-D1, which uses the same Sony sensor as several popular Nikon DSLRs. Its high ISO performance is very good for short exposures, but long exposures really suffer compared to the Canon 10D. It will be interesting to see if this camera has the same characteristic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now