istvan_sandor Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Hi,Could anyone tell me whether this lens has ever been upgraded ?The reason I am asking is that I intend to purchase one and I have 2 copies tochoose from.One is 12 years old and the other is of 2006 production.The old one has some sign of use but optically and mechanically looks OK and (ofcourse) the price is very appealing.Does anyone have any knowledge whether there has ever been any silent upgradee.g. less reflecting coating for digital cameras or anything else ?Thanks a lot in advance,Istvan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotograf Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 What do you mean by "upgrade?" The lens has legendary performance and is used professionally. There is a 70-200 f/2.8 and and IS version of the same lens. IS is useful when you want a slower shutter speed but since both lenses are at f/2.8 I'm sure they're both great in low light photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
istvan_sandor Posted September 4, 2007 Author Share Posted September 4, 2007 brian, thanks for your comment, I would actually like to find out whether there is (by production) any difference between a 1 year old and a 12 year old copy of the same lens ? best, Istvan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eos 10 fan Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Looking at the parts list shows us that a few pieces have been changed. There is no date on the parts list so there is no way of telling if further changes have been made. [.PDF] http://www.f20c.com/stuff/canon/partslist/EF%2070-200%202.8%20L%20USM.PDF Full list of parts lists available is here: http://www.f20c.com/stuff/canon/partslist/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 Canon have never said anything about changes as far as i know, so if any were made I'd assume they were minor and inconsequential and didn't involve the optics. The major thing to look out for with older lenses is fungal growth on the glass. It can be very hard to spot in its early stages and the older a lens is, the higher the chances that it may have started if the lens wasn't stored properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shambrick007 Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 I thought that there was a "silent" upgrade to some of the IS parts to deal w/the some of the err-99 issues that would occur w/the earlier versions. I know that I've seen this. There is also a page where a user repaired the lens himself to replace the old IS part with the new....do some Googling. I'd pass on the older one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shambrick007 Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 crap..OK I see that you were talking about the non-IS version....never mind then.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DickArnold Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 I have owned one for over then years. I works just fine. It takes great pictures. Watch the fungus but I think it will last another ten years and I have used it pretty hard. It still looks new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotograf Posted September 5, 2007 Share Posted September 5, 2007 Another thing, is even though the original was made 12 years ago- in no way did Canon make the 70-200 f/2.8 12 years ago and stop making that particular NON-IS lens. It's still made, even though the Image Stabilized lens is also made. I've never used both to compare them, but I've heard the NON-IS lenses that Canon makes are sharper than Image Stabilized counterparts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now