Norma Desmond Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 I'm actually seeking elucidation from some of the more experienced photographers on PN. I seem to notice that so-called "high key" photographs are quite prevalent these days on PN and getting a lot of attention. I don't personally like what I've been seeing, and of course that's purely a subjective matter. But I'm not sure if that's because I just don't like high key or if what I'm seeing is just some current fad and not actually high key. Can any of you discuss this and point me in the direction of both good and bad high key shots. A lot of what I see seems to cross the line into what I would consider graphic arts (some actually look like black and white comic strip), where I'm seeing more white photo paper than actual image and more unsightly streaks of black acting as effect than photographic detail. As I'm here to learn, I'd love your thoughts and any examples on the subject. Thanks, folks. We didn't need dialogue. We had faces! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
art_haykin Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 Richard Avedon was one of the first to go contrasty and high key, and blow out skin tones completely on his women models. Like any other effect, it should be germane to the intent of the image, and not just to be different or stylish. There is an unfortunate tendency, I fear, for gimicks to become fads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wigwam jones Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 And then fads become trends, and then trends become mainstream. OMG! We must put a stop to this immediately. (grin) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug_axford1 Posted March 23, 2007 Share Posted March 23, 2007 It's no different than shooting with horizon lines at 30 deg. or out of focus portraits. Some people just need to break the mold and it suddenly becomes the trend. Part of the problem is that digital allows us to 'play' with images so much more easily on the computer. We're starting to sell Warhol look-a-likes. Make an action in PS and you too can be Andy Warhol in 5 seconds. When everyone produces wierd photos, I want to be the first to re-invent 'normal portraits'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbs Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 I personally enjoy high key and occasionally in color.<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_s Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Am I missin' something here? The photograph shown has blown highlights, but it isn't at all high-key. A high-key image simply has a preponderance of high values on the print. It has nothing to do with blown highlights or extremes of contrast. A good high-key photograph will typically have some low values to provide accent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Dave is right, there is a misunderstanding about high key. A good example of what high key means is here: http://www.pbase.com/djarvik/image/52994040 I'm not saying it's a good photograph, it's not really something I care for, but it is high key as opposed to the one above. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norma Desmond Posted March 24, 2007 Author Share Posted March 24, 2007 Dave and Jeff-- Thanks for the substantive and constructive responses and, Jeff, for the example. I appreciate it. We didn't need dialogue. We had faces! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbs Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I stand corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now