Jump to content

What is Photo Shop good for?


Recommended Posts

I think what the web site is saying is that they don't want the image manipulated. Most news services will fire you if you have 'manipulated' an image. It also applies to images of show dogs, cattle, legal, etc. where someone has 'altered' an image that is not an accurate representation of the truth.

 

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree *generally* with what Jeff stated, but not specifically. If a site has specific, and detailed, guidelines for what is and is not acceptable for their site, then I see no reason to shun them - just because they have an opinion about how much is too much doesn't mean they have not right to host an internet gallery. Face it, we all have an opinion on that topic, some people are just more professional than others when discussing it, so why turn your nose up at someone who feels differently than you? Now, if they just use the blanket term 'no photoshop!' and give no specific reason for their choice, then, yes, it si quite possible that they are not going to be very professional, and therefore not worth dealing with. There are afew very good sites for people who do not use photoshop in any way, special interested groups if you will, that have a very clearly defined reasoning for their choice to apply such a limitation, and that, in my opinion, makes all the difference.

 

- Randy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To darken a specific area of a photo is called "burning" and Photoshop works quit well for this...

 

1. Create a new layer (set the blending mode to overlay and check the 'fill with medium gray box')

2. Press 'D' to set the background color to black

3. Choose a soft edged brush (set the opacity to around 15%) and run it over the area you wish to darken.

4. Once you have finished add a gaussian blur to the new layer to blend the effect nicely.

 

To lighten an area of the photo is called dodging, and can be done in exactly the same way as above, just use white as the color instead of black.

 

Hope this helps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS replaces hours in a darkroom breathing noxious chemicals. It's scope is amazing although due to a steep learning curve not many people use it to its full potential. For art and commercial photogaphers it is indispensible with it's power to fine tune images and add to them. Try designing a poster sometime with multiple layers, graphics and text, this is where it shines. If you love photography, you'll know that taking the picture is perhaps not enven 50 percent of the process, the rest is processing and presentation and that's why you need something like PS or an equivalent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even before photoshop, if you or someone else wasn't controlling things like contrast, color

balance, cropping etc. of your film and subsequent prints, the results likely didn't come close

to what you eyes saw when you took the photograph. I would argue that with film and digital

there SHOULD be manipulation of parameters like contrast, sharpening etc, or your images

likely aren't reaching their full potential, and the idea that you could handle a digital file or

scanned film without image editing software is not realistic. I suspect they mean there is an

accepted level of manipulation they accept. There is a line between manipulation and

fabrication that is discussed frequently on photo.net, where that line rests depends on who

you ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to work in a newspaper darkroom where most prints were burned and dodged to make the best possible image for reproduction. As others have said, Photoshop (and other such programs) are simply electronic tools for doing the exact same things digitally (plus infinitely more). If someone forbids Photoshopping, find out if they ever scan and adjust image "levels" for optimum posting on their sites. If they do, does the word "hypocracy" come to mind?

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hence my comments above on outlining what is acceptable and what is not. A certain amount of correction needs to be done in order to make what shows up on the monitor appear similar to the physical print, and even then, what shows up on the monitor never looks exactly like the print I'm scanning. I've never seen any site (but I've not looked extensively either) that said you can only post straight from the scanner - they all have a set list of criteria that must be met to either (as on this forum) qualify as 'unaltered' or to be allowed to be posted at all.

 

- Randy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...