Tony Rowlett Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Greetings to all, especially new forum readers/participants. <p> I understand that photo.net received over 10,000 new member registrations last month! So there is a good chance that you are one of those new members. <p> <b>WHO AM I</b><br>I am taking this opportunity to introduce myself as the primary moderator for this forum. Our forum is very lucky to have the assistance of Mike Dixon also as a forum moderator here. If you need any assistance whatsoever I am at your service. Please contact me personally via email and I will respond as soon as I am able. To find my email address, just click on my name and and then the link that requests my email address. Please use a good subject line in any emails you send me. As with the majority of people who've used email for some length of time, within less than about a 10th of a second, my mind either flags an email as spam or recognizes it as worthy of opening, and that is based on the name and the subject line. <p> <b>TERMS OF USE</b><br>It is my duty to point out the <b><a href="http://www.photo.net/terms-of-use">photo.net Terms of Use</a></b> which, as a user of photo.net, you are required to read, understand, and adhere to. Please review that page. Additionally, each forum has an "About" section which usually contains some forum-specific rules that you must also follow. Please have a look at <b><a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/policy?topic_id=1548">the Leica and Rangefinder Forum Guidelines</a></b>. <p> <b>FROM THE EDITOR</B><br>There is a <b><a href="http://www.photo.net/from-the-editor/200701">Letter from The Editor</a></b>, Philip Greenspun (Editor in Chief and originator of photo.net) which offers information on new staff, new hardware, etc., that you are encouraged to read. <p> <b>ABOUT US</B><BR> There is an updated <b><a href="http://www.photo.net/about-us">About Us</a></b> page that will reveal the people behind photo.net including who all the moderators are. Please have a look. <p> <b>GREATEST LEICA SPOT</B><BR> Please continue to make this one of the most interesting photography forums on the internet. If you discover any inappropriate posting behavior, please do not respond but rather send me an email which details the inappropriateness, including the URL of the thread in question. NOTE: responding to inappropriate posts in effect can make you just as guilty as the original offender. Don't be a sucker: send me email instead. I will promptly take care of the matter. <p> Welcome new members! What do you want to know? Teach us by asking. What do you have to teach? Ask us and we will all learn. Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven_moseley1 Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Hi Tony, I am fairly new to PN and am a Leica user, but plenty of Leica users seem to have sense of humour bypasses..makes me chuckle though bless em.. cheers Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fjords Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 <b>< </b>FROM THE EDITOR There is a Letter from The Editor, Philip Greenspun (Editor in Chief and originator of photo.net) which offers information on new staff, new hardware, etc., that you are encouraged to read.<b>></b> <b>"</b> One general rule is 'if the product was discontinued more than 15 years ago, stop talking about it." Expect to see more about digital cameras and less about film and LP records.<b>"</b> <b>WTF ?</b> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_evans4 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 <p><em>One general rule is "if the product was discontinued more than 15 years ago, stop talking about it"</em> <a href="http://www.photo.net/from-the-editor/200701">we are told</a>.</p><p>Well, there's little potential ad revenue in old stuff.</p><p>I always say that gormless males should be fluffed up as much as possible to buy as much new camera gear as possible. It helps the Japanese economy, and the more money they spend on camera gear the less they have left over for SUVs, guns and similar silliness.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron_breeze2 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Peter, what is a gormless male? I've got to know because I love that phrase! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christopher_a._junker1 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 If I am looking for guidance on over 15 year old RF gear, this is where I come first. I'd rather buy old stuff here, even if I have to wait as I have no use for e.*. The "old stuff" seems to remain in demand, we are even willing to get it repaired and rebuilt through forum contacts, and dealers like K&H have old stuff. Wonder how the dealers would feel about a policy that discourages selling/trading in old Leica, Canon and Nikon rangefinder equipment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken_ford1 Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Gormless = http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gormless I'll take my 15 year old cameras *and* a few more guns! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry_kirkwood Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Wow, this thread now makes absolutely no sense at all with references to deleted comments about the "feisty bunch of guys" insult sign being pinned to the backs of everyone who enters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Rowlett Posted February 1, 2007 Author Share Posted February 1, 2007 Jerry, what are you talking about? Thanks for keeping my thread on the topic of being "feisty," especially after I attempted to get the thread back onto topic by removing 12 threads that were off topic (and quite stupid). With your help we can probably look forward to never being called feisty again, yah? Got a camera? Backups? We don’t need no stinking ba #.’ _ , J Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r s Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Tony, <br> to quote Philip: "One general rule is "if the product was discontinued more than 15 years ago, stop talking about it." ( <a href="http://www.photo.net/from-the-editor/200701">Link</a href> ). <br><br> Since this is now a general rule are we discouraged/not allowed to post anything pertaining to for instance the older Leica LTM cameras? <br><br> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephen_w. Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00JlCC&tag= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r s Posted February 1, 2007 Share Posted February 1, 2007 Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerry_kirkwood Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 <i>With your help we can probably look forward to never being called feisty again, yah? Got a camera?</i></p>I take it that's your illustration of <i><b>NOTE: responding to inappropriate posts in effect can make you just as guilty as the original offender.</b></i></p>? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now