r s Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 I tried out using IR film for the first time a few weeks ago - in my Leica III(F).<br>Put an old, dark-red filter on an equally old Elmar 50/3.5 and I was off to theraces. I thought..<br><br>After having loaded (and cutting) the film in a dark restroom in a cafe upin Northern California I realized I had to guesstimate the exposure as the filmisn't really ISO rated. On top of that I *cough-cough* forgot to fully extendthe Elmar and realized that the shutter was dragging a bit..and I may have alight leak. Life was good.<br><br>It was fun and different in that I looked for scenes that I normally wouldn'twhen shooting regular B&W film but the result...well, here are some for you to'enjoy':<br><br><center><img src="http://www.pbase.com/rsilfverberg/image/73980045/medium.jpg"><br><br><img src="http://www.pbase.com/rsilfverberg/image/73980046/medium.jpg"><br><br><img src="http://www.pbase.com/rsilfverberg/image/73980048/medium.jpg"></center><br><br>A lengthier rambling about this 'experience' and some more photos at <ahref="http://silfver.blogspot.com/2007/02/when-it-all-goes-wrong.html">BatteriesNot Included.</a href><br><br>Anyone else out there who have similar photography stories - and thephotos to show? :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve deer Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 keep on doing it... number 1 is amazing! s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl_graf Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 I'm looking forward to see something once you've resolved the proplem. IR photography isn't easy. I gave it up long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_moravec1 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 I have a friend who did a wedding with a lens that was not fully extended and he was a pro. He switched to a rigid model Summicron new at the time. Just sold that black rigid lens to a collector for $800. Although I never did IR with a screw body, I have used the lens and it is just great. The IR focus mark is correct at 5.6 with a Leica IR filter or B+W 092 or 093. Exposure is 1/250 at 6.3 in sun and I never bracket. If you have a M6 or R body, set ISO to 800 and meter right thru the filter. Works in sun or shade or deep shade if you observe normal rules for reflected light meters, IE do not meter white foliage or grass without compensating, same as regular film and snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_brewton Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Rich, looks similar to some pinhole shots. IR can be a booger bear! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Gilbert Grosvener (editor of National Geographic) kept forgetting to extend the lens on his Leica and missed many shots in the exotic places he traveled. Finally, he brought it to their new camera repairman, Marty Forsher, to devise something to remind him to extend the lens. Instead, Marty soldered it out so it couldn't be retracted. He was fired on the spot! That's when he started Professional Camera Repair, which for many years was the unquestioned premiere camera repair and equipment problem-solving facility in the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Yep. The lens wasn't pulled out and screwed down right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pico Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 <i>Gilbert Grosvener (editor of National Geographic) kept forgetting to extend the lens on his Leica and missed many shots in the exotic places he traveled. Finally, he brought it to their new camera repairman, Marty Forsher, to devise something to remind him to extend the lens. Instead, Marty soldered it out so it couldn't be retracted. <u>He was fired on the spot</u></i><p>Those were evil, wicked times, IMHO, when the Grosveners rose from bottom-feeders to become sharks. Sure, they <u>were</u> the NG Society, but did things get better when they fired in the manner they did? Dunno. <p> Forsher was a saint. He's the one who modified some 180mm F2.5 Nikon-S lenses to work on the F for us newspaper guys and he did so much more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_ries Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Number one is certainly a keeper, I really like the composition. I would not not look at these as failures. You certainly know how to compose a picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron_breeze2 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 You didn't say which brand of IR film your shooting. If its Kodak HIE then use 1/125th at F11. I use the Leica IR filter and the IR focusing mark and get perfect results. Of course you will need to pull the lens out and if you don't do your own processing results can vary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_nesbitt Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Looks like you have the idea and an eye for it. I love IR photography. Have never had much luck useing a camera with a cloth shutter, such as my Leica III. Hassey and Nikon much sharper in results, though any SLR is less than ideal with a very dark filter. Sorry I have no current digitized IRs. Maybe some a little later. Have fun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r s Posted February 5, 2007 Author Share Posted February 5, 2007 Thanks for the encouraging comments.<br> I was using Kodak HSI film. <br> Someone mentioned the IR focusing mark on the Elmar - could someone explain a bit about how to use it when focusing? <br>Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soeren_engelbrecht1 Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Rich, I feel with you - I blew this family shot on Christmas morning by forgetting to extend the lens. Bugger. Now where was that soldering iron again ?? :-) Cheers, Soeren<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan flanders Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Back in the forties I salvaged the 100mm?/2.0 Xenon from a defunct German aerial camera and Forscher made a coupled adapter for my old Leica III. I used it for circus photos for several years until I went broke in college and had to take an offer I couldn't refuse. Never seen anything like it since then. BTW: the colored spice bottle lids that I often tout for lens caps would have done old Grosvenor up brown. With one of the red ones on the lens you are not likely to forget to take it off and in doing so the lens would have been properly extended. DIY rules! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex_lofquist Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 When I didn't have a rear lens cap for my Elmar, I would stuff lens tissue inside it, before sticking it in my pocket. More than once I would forget to remove it when switching back to that lens, and not realizing it until the photos were developed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_mccarthy3 Posted February 6, 2007 Share Posted February 6, 2007 Very cool, Rich - Now all you need is a pretentious artists' statement and a gallery connection, and you can make a fortune! Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r s Posted February 6, 2007 Author Share Posted February 6, 2007 I think I'll start with correctly exposed and somewhat sharp photos :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now