bartphoto Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I would like to know if there is a reasonable fisheye on the market that equals the nikon one. Ive found the sigma 8mm but im afraid it will make my pictures too fishy. What is the equivilent of 8mm on a film camera to 8mm on a diig? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 8mm on film should be about 12mm on a Nikon digital body that has a 1.5x digital factor. The AF 10.5mm DX Nikkor is wide, but you really have to use a tripod to keep the lens as level as you can....<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjacksonphoto Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I'm not sure there is an equivalent prime for digital. Why not use the Nikon?<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joseph_smith3 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 With the Nikon 10.5mm lens, when you process the images in Nikon Capture, all images taken only with the Nikon fisheye lens get "the proportions fixed" automatically with the touch of a button. Why give this up? Joe Smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry_ Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 "With the Nikon 10.5mm lens, when you process the images in Nikon Capture, all images taken only with the Nikon fisheye lens get "the proportions fixed" automatically with the touch of a button." You must shoot in NEF file format to get the 'corrections' available in Nikon Capture. The distortion is not 100 percent "fixed," but altered some. You have to play with Nikon Capture to see what it can and cannot do with your image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfoster70 Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 Am I missing something? Why would you buy a fisheye lens and then spend all day trying to correct the fisheye distortion? Why not buy a super wide angle lens like the Nikon 12-24mm, Tamron 11-18mm, Tokina 12-24mm, or the Sigma 10-20mm? Sure these have distortion, but its much easier to fix. And These serve a much better purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 "I used to think the 16mm would equate to a 24mm, but the consensus appears to be it looks more like a 20mm." For angle of coverage and such real optical properties, you do not need any "consensus". What you get is what you see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FttO&tag= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjacksonphoto Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 Kevin With the Nikon, you get the option of fisheye or rectilinear wide angle through the one-click Nikon Capture adjustment. That's the advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vivek iyer Posted June 10, 2006 Share Posted June 10, 2006 Whatever,Peter, enjoy your 10.5! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now