jordan_starr Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 I just ordered 100ft of kodak plus-x film iso125 from the US (i'm in canada) and developed a roll and it looks like it wasn't developed enough. I think it might be my developer, but i'm not sure. would xrays have this effect or is it my deveoloper that's old? i'd like to know before i start spending more time shooting photos have have them turn out like crap. thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 If you search the Web using the terms "film" "damage" "TSA" you'll find a couple of sites that shouw pictures of x-ray damaged film. Typically it is bands of damage rather than overall even damage. This might help you visualize what x-ray damage to film looks like. Why don't you try your film again in fresh chemistry and double-check your temps and times? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordan_w. Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 X-rays cause fogging (dark areas on the film). Check your developer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_dunn2 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 <cite>Typically it is bands of damage rather than overall even damage.</cite> <p>It depends on the machine in question. The high-energy scanners for checked baggage, which have been deployed in a number of airports in recent years, tend to produce bands. The ones more typically used for carryon tend to produce overall fogging. I have no idea what sort of equipment is used to scan film sent by mail or courier.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Steve, According to teh x-ray machine mfg specs, TSA/Kodak guidance, and industry association studies, the machines used for carry-on luggage (and most mail scanning, from what I've heard) does not cause fogging of 125 ASA film... unless, maybe, it's subjected to the x-ray many, many, many times. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrianS1664879711 Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 From Rapiscan specs: HEALTH & SAFETY All Rapiscan Systems products comply with applicable international health and safety regulations including USA FDA X-ray systems (Federal Standard 21CFR 1020.40) and Health and Safety at Work Act 1974-section 6, Amended by the Consumer Protection Act 1987. Maximum leakage radiation less than 0.1mR/hr (1젓v/hr) in contact with outer panels. Film Safety: For ISO 1600/33 DIN, guaranteed up to 10 times exposure to radiation. CE Compliance: Yes FCC & IEC Compliance: Yes ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franklin_polk Posted March 9, 2006 Share Posted March 9, 2006 Your film wouldn't be fogged by x-rays. They don't x-ray packacges going on cargo planes, since there are no passengers, unless the packages are suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
don myers Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 My wife is a photo lab specialist, and is always commenting on the effects of x-rays on people's film -- foggy and washed out. Also, my Dad was Assistant Director of the FAA in the '70's, a photographer, and instrimental in instituting metal detectors and x-ray machines in airports -- He NEVER passed his film through x-rays, but asked that it be inspected by hand; he incouraged me to do the same, and my wife would too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike dixon Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 <i>My wife is a photo lab specialist, and is always commenting on the effects of x-rays on people's film -- foggy and washed out.</i><P> Does she know that these foggy, washed out rolls of film were passed through x-ray machines rather than being poorly exposed, long out-of-date, and/or left in a hot car for half the summer?<P> <i>Dad was Assistant Director of the FAA in the '70's, a photographer, and instrimental in instituting metal detectors and x-ray machines in airports -- He NEVER passed his film through x-rays, but asked that it be inspected by hand;</i><P> If I were using airports with 70s-era baggage scanners, that might well be sound advice. Following the guidelines for current machines (don't worry about carry-on scanners for film speeds under 800), I've never seen x-ray damage to any of the hundreds of rolls of film that I passed through the carry-on scanner (many of them several times).<P> To the original poster: <b>get some fresh developer</b>. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now