Jump to content

xrays and film. possible problem.


Recommended Posts

I just ordered 100ft of kodak plus-x film iso125 from the US (i'm in

canada) and developed a roll and it looks like it wasn't developed

enough. I think it might be my developer, but i'm not sure. would

xrays have this effect or is it my deveoloper that's old? i'd like to

know before i start spending more time shooting photos have have them

turn out like crap. thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you search the Web using the terms "film" "damage" "TSA" you'll find a couple of sites that shouw pictures of x-ray damaged film. Typically it is bands of damage rather than overall even damage. This might help you visualize what x-ray damage to film looks like.

 

Why don't you try your film again in fresh chemistry and double-check your temps and times?

...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<cite>Typically it is bands of damage rather than overall even damage.</cite>

 

<p>It depends on the machine in question. The high-energy scanners for checked baggage, which have been deployed in a number of airports in recent years, tend to produce bands. The ones more typically used for carryon tend to produce overall fogging. I have no idea what sort of equipment is used to scan film sent by mail or courier.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve, According to teh x-ray machine mfg specs, TSA/Kodak guidance, and industry association studies, the machines used for carry-on luggage (and most mail scanning, from what I've heard) does not cause fogging of 125 ASA film... unless, maybe, it's subjected to the x-ray many, many, many times.
...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Rapiscan specs:

 

HEALTH & SAFETY

All Rapiscan Systems products comply with applicable international

health and safety regulations including USA FDA X-ray systems

(Federal Standard 21CFR 1020.40) and Health and Safety at Work

Act 1974-section 6, Amended by the Consumer Protection Act

1987. Maximum leakage radiation less than 0.1mR/hr (1젓v/hr)

in contact with outer panels.

 

Film Safety: For ISO 1600/33 DIN, guaranteed up to 10 times

exposure to radiation.

 

CE Compliance: Yes

FCC & IEC Compliance: Yes

...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife is a photo lab specialist, and is always commenting on the effects of x-rays on people's film -- foggy and washed out. Also, my Dad was Assistant Director of the FAA in the '70's, a photographer, and instrimental in instituting metal detectors and x-ray machines in airports -- He NEVER passed his film through x-rays, but asked that it be inspected by hand; he incouraged me to do the same, and my wife would too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<i>My wife is a photo lab specialist, and is always commenting on the effects of x-rays on people's film -- foggy and washed out.</i><P>

Does she know that these foggy, washed out rolls of film were passed through x-ray machines rather than being poorly exposed, long out-of-date, and/or left in a hot car for half the summer?<P>

<i>Dad was Assistant Director of the FAA in the '70's, a photographer, and instrimental in instituting metal detectors and x-ray machines in airports -- He NEVER passed his film through x-rays, but asked that it be inspected by hand;</i><P>

If I were using airports with 70s-era baggage scanners, that might well be sound advice. Following the guidelines for current machines (don't worry about carry-on scanners for film speeds under 800), I've never seen x-ray damage to any of the hundreds of rolls of film that I passed through the carry-on scanner (many of them several times).<P>

To the original poster: <b>get some fresh developer</b>.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...